JillA
Well-Known Member
Ah right, I understand, so the owner of the horse isn't in any way responsible for the damage that it causes to someone who's legally using a Public Right of Way and across his land?
Attaching blame isn't the point, the point is one of responsibility and the owner of the horse, I'd have thought would be responsible in a civil manner to restore the dog owner to their previous state and before they entered the land where they had a legal right to be. His horse kicked a dog and injured it, occasioning damage and a bill for £107. QED I'd have thought. No?
Alec.
No. You have to use the law as a basis, as I said earlier it isn't the same as a moral standpoint, that is up to the individual but that goes over and above the legal points