puddicat
Well-Known Member
Er. no not quite what I was trying to say. I have no view on anybody's education other than people who get paid money to things and do things they claim to know something about. So I wasn't referring to readership, horseowners etc etc when I was talking about education - I am only concerned with the quality of the knowledge offered by 'people offering therapy services' there, lets generalise.
The point I was trying to make was along the following lines, if you want an authoritative article on piano playing you ask a concert pianist not someone doing their grade 3 piano exam. The concert pianist does not need to ask the grade 3 student for their comments or advice because in the course of their training they've been there, got the T shirt and moved on. So the point is 'people offering therapy services' have a simplistic knowledge of what they are doing which is (1) not scientific and (2) superceeded in detail by a professional medical training. So who do you get to write the article?
The point I was trying to make was along the following lines, if you want an authoritative article on piano playing you ask a concert pianist not someone doing their grade 3 piano exam. The concert pianist does not need to ask the grade 3 student for their comments or advice because in the course of their training they've been there, got the T shirt and moved on. So the point is 'people offering therapy services' have a simplistic knowledge of what they are doing which is (1) not scientific and (2) superceeded in detail by a professional medical training. So who do you get to write the article?