Cocorules
Well-Known Member
I agree with magic melon who said about stabling for no real reason. Freedom to move is really important. It is entirely possible to restrict grazing without stabling.
People stable to prevent weight gain and to stop horse from developing laminitis. there is a lot more grass in Ireland and uk than in most countries . A lot more horses would have laminitis if they were out 24/7
Would effect very few horses .
and there’s much more to worry about than whiskers .
I would start with robust continuing professional development for farriers worked into a system to weed out the bad .
the tide of equine misery being caused by bad shoeing is appalling .
Really how many horses do you see with their whiskers trimmed .
this assumes that the owner is free to manage their grazing as they choose. Lots of us at livery are totally at the mercy of the YO, when it comes to pasture managament.I dont believe this either. Sorry, but more often than not the horse needs to lose weight, surely the best way is by exercise (by being outside (or in an indoor school etc.) moving around) and not stuck standing about in a box all day. Whats wrong with electric fencing a very small paddock for these horses that need it? At least they're out moving around and their calorie intake is in check. Not a reason to stable in my opinion. Loads of people stable for no real reason, just because it seems to be some sort of never-ending tradition. I just dont get it personally. Sure, stable if the horse genuinely needs it (of course there are times) but I bet 90% of horses are stabled for no real reason other than the owner feels like it. Doesnt exactly benefit the horse.
I'd support this in the UK, along with a ban on mane pulling, which I find utterly barbaric...
I’d certainly support a ban on trimming whiskers, but why mane pulling? My one enjoys it, his lower lip wobbles, sometimes he starts to fall asleep or start grooming me.I'd support this in the UK, along with a ban on mane pulling, which I find utterly barbaric...
I honestly can't get exercised about cutting off whiskers. I'm sure the horse misses them at first but quickly becomes used to their absence. I don't see show horses going around constantly smacking their heads on things.
I don't trim whiskers myself but I think there are far more worthy things to worry about.
It seems very strange to me to ban trimming whiskers while still placing grotesquely fat horses in showing, keeping breeding stallions permanently stabled, keeping more and more horses in tiny individual paddock turnout, and routinely injecting dressage horses joints.
All this above and the trimming pales into insignificance though, compared to the still ongoing breeding and fly grazing, dumping of dead and dying nondescript, non-passported, non microchipped equines, doesnt it?
(Not aimed at you ycbm but food for thought to those getting hot under the collar about hogging and trimming)
I'm not feeling particularly hot under the collar about trimming etc, but unlike sorting passports and fly grazing, the affiliated competition organisations could easily put a rule in to say no more whisker trimming and that would take virtually nothing in terms of effort and would have a trickle down positive effect.All this above and the trimming pales into insignificance though, compared to the still ongoing breeding and fly grazing, dumping of dead and dying nondescript, non-passported, non microchipped equines, doesnt it?
(Not aimed at you ycbm but food for thought to those getting hot under the collar about hogging and trimming)
and the stopping of tail docking (I mean really, why the heck is that still happening?).
As far as I know the only place that it's still legal to dock or nick tails is the USA.
Mrs M: the cutting or shaving of draught horse tail hair (and before that the docking of the tail) is supposed to be to stop the hair from getting caught up in the harness. Why this should be a problem at all, considering that other harness horses seem to be able to work in harness just fine with their long tails eludes me.
Strange that the land of the free should be so inclined.
Equestrian Sports New Zealand and the New Zealand Pony Club Association will no longer allow the trimming of either the whiskers or inner ear hair of horses and ponies competing at their events and activities.
The two organisations have joined their French, Swiss and German counterparts in banning this trimming on welfare grounds.
I'm surprised that you'd support a ban on trimming whiskers but seem surprised I'd support a ban on mane pulling, given that it involves pulling out hair by the root. It's great that your horse enjoys it, but the vast majority of horses just about tolerate it and some find it excruciatingly painful and are still forced to tolerate it with twitches etc. I'd rather it were banned outright, otherwise every other person will just say "oh but my horse likes it" and how on earth would you prove it unless you actually tried pulling it?I’d certainly support a ban on trimming whiskers, but why mane pulling? My one enjoys it, his lower lip wobbles, sometimes he starts to fall asleep or start grooming me.
That’s not the same for every horse but I think a bit of common sense can be used - if they dislike it, then don’t do it, but if they do then there’s no reason not to.
Really how many horses do you see with their whiskers trimmed .
People are just going to ignore it and do it’s anyway and judge will still let the people win . I think there there is more things that should be banned like obese horses should be banned from showing it can lead to death . Btw I don’t trim or shave whiskers but I think other issues that should be look at in the competition world.