SpottedCat
Well-Known Member
But again, not sure it was better than Nicola's?!
Nicola comments on her test: http://equestrianteamgbr.blogspot.c...=blog.talkinghorse.net&utm_source=twitterfeed
Okay, I'm probably going to get flamed here but...
I DO agree that Nicola Wilson was harshly judged for sure, but some of the other combinations simiply had better moving horses which I think in the end overrode some of the mistakes. Opposition Buzz was foot perfect in his delivery of the test, but lacked a bit of flash - so unless eventing dressage is so different from pure dressage, I think that having that wow factor still goes a long way...
Okay, I'm probably going to get flamed here but...
I DO agree that Nicola Wilson was harshly judged for sure, but some of the other combinations simiply had better moving horses which I think in the end overrode some of the mistakes. Opposition Buzz was foot perfect in his delivery of the test, but lacked a bit of flash - so unless eventing dressage is so different from pure dressage, I think that having that wow factor still goes a long way...
Is anyone else feeling quite irked at the number of empty seats?![]()
Here's the thing though, in eventing you're looking for a horse who can do all three phases . . . and (IMHO) the wow factor is more part of pure dressage than eventing. I would expect judges of eventing dressage to be looking more at relaxation, submission and accuracy than flash.
P
Looking forward to Mary King !
Here's the thing though, in eventing you're looking for a horse who can do all three phases . . . and (IMHO) the wow factor is more part of pure dressage than eventing. I would expect judges of eventing dressage to be looking more at relaxation, submission and accuracy than flash.P
RE the empty seats - don't forget you're allowed to walk the XC today too and I suspect some (lots?) of people will be doing that....