FullThrottle
Well-Known Member
I couldn't care less, my little chap is very head shy and does only trust me. he wouldn't try it with anyone else. other people can barely get near his head so i don't mind him rubbing on me at all
I think it's horrible and just showing bad manners. It hurts and especially when they almost send you flying. And what's stopping the horse doing it to a small child if it knows it's perfectly okay to do it to an adult?
Are they friends?It is a dominant thing - if you watch my two horses in the field, dominant mare will walk up to Puzzle and rub against her til the cows came home, but Puzzle NEVER rubs against the dominant mare or anyone and is always super itchy when I give her a scratch.
Oh! Mine has always done this. As soon as I get off and he would knock me off my feet if I let him. And I had to change his bit because it was a full cheek snaffle and it got caught up in my hat strap once and nearly knocked me off my feet. I didn't realise that it was the height of disrespect and bad manners. Oh!!! I am quite shocked at how this is absolutely not allowed (not shocked in a mardy way but genuinely surprised).
Erm - I've had him 8 years now. How do I stop him doing it without falling out with him every single day?
But is it? ETA: I'm not saying your pov is invalid, just that being 'senior partner' in a relationship doesn't have to be interpreted as being 'higher in the pecking order' or some such. (Not being a horse, and not wanting to be treated as one, or seen as one for competing with them for social status or whatever, I leave matters of dominance to horses themselves and concentrate on getting the behaviours I want.)It is about us being the more senior partner in the relationship
I'm not convinced, sorry! People have said that it's only the dominant horse who initiates mutual grooming. Other people have reported the opposite - that the dominant 'invites' the subordinate to start grooming first before reciprocating. I have observed both dominant and subordinate initiating mutual grooming. So maybe who starts isn't to do with who is dominant. Maybe it's just a coincidence.and as flamehead says, the more dominant horse will rub on its companion but generally not the other way round.
Or perhaps the kind of person who allows one type of 'bad' (i.e. unwanted) behaviour is liable to allow other kinds of bad behaviour as well?I feel that if you allow rough head rubbing whenever the horse feels like it, you may inadvertently be encouraging other behaviours to creep in - ie not standing still when required, being pushy when leading etc.
Ditto!only my opinion mind!!
Potentially, yes! It's definitely a behaviour I would discourage if I wanted a horse that was safe around people in general, including children. And I would always discourage nipping - there's really no reason to allow a horse to nip people (except perhaps if you were training a horse for the movies).Its dangerous though!
Horses can be friends too you know! The fancy term for it is 'affiliative behaviour'. Lucy Rees (zoologist and horse trainer) wrote a great piece in a chapter called "Bullies, leaders and friends" which talks about the differences between these roles in herd life.What do you mean are they friends? They're horses! Dotty dominates and tolerates and likes Puzzle and Puzzle likes Dotty but they are of a herd mentality as they're herd animals.....!
Ok, but maybe it's just the arrangement that Dotty and Puzzle have come to? I wouldn't be too quick to state it as a general rule that applies to all horses without watching a lot of horses first. The reason I asked if they were friends is that if they weren't I would be surprised if a subordinate hung around when the dominant came marching up for whatever reason.And I'm right, I spend hours and hours watching my horses in the field and you're right about mutual grooming as Dotty will initiate and then Puzzle will react BUT Puzzle NEVER EVER is allowed to rub against Dotty. xxxx
But is it? ETA: I'm not saying your pov is invalid, just that being 'senior partner' in a relationship doesn't have to be interpreted as being 'higher in the pecking order' or some such. (Not being a horse, and not wanting to be treated as one, or seen as one for competing with them for social status or whatever, I leave matters of dominance to horses themselves and concentrate on getting the behaviours I want.)
I'm not convinced, sorry! People have said that it's only the dominant horse who initiates mutual grooming. Other people have reported the opposite - that the dominant 'invites' the subordinate to start grooming first before reciprocating. I have observed both dominant and subordinate initiating mutual grooming. So maybe who starts isn't to do with who is dominant. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
Or perhaps the kind of person who allows one type of 'bad' (i.e. unwanted) behaviour is liable to allow other kinds of bad behaviour as well?
Ditto!