Irishcob6
Well-Known Member
It Doesn’t actually say she’s brought him, the wording of he’s with me now is a little odd! Sounds like Mary Wanless may own him?Wonder how much she actually bought him for though. And how much was ‘left over’
It Doesn’t actually say she’s brought him, the wording of he’s with me now is a little odd! Sounds like Mary Wanless may own him?Wonder how much she actually bought him for though. And how much was ‘left over’
God forbid a kid take a punt on something in the hopes of keeping a horse she loves her with her.Urgh what a way to set a precedent she got what she wantedlet's see more entitled kids start doing the same because clearly, it works
![]()
God forbid a kid take a punt on something in the hopes of keeping a horse she loves her with her.
If kids want to try their luck with something like this, might as well let them. No one’s holding guns to people’s heads forcing them to donate.
Right - so much transparency to those who donated...Wonder how much she actually bought him for though. And how much was ‘left over’
It Doesn’t actually say she’s brought him, the wording of he’s with me now is a little odd! Sounds like Mary Wanless may own him?
View attachment 172358
From LZ/PR Instagram
I did ask this on MD post but no response as yetView attachment 172359
Well from what I remember, MD was always a part owner and one of the original syndicate members. So presumably she and MW have bought LZ share. I dunno, I do think donors deserve transparency, but I know that sometimes sales agreements have clauses that the price can't be disclosed...I did ask this on MD post but no response as yetView attachment 172359
It's not so much the amount of money as to whom the money has gone toWell from what I remember, MD was always a part owner and one of the original syndicate members. So presumably she and MW have bought LZ share. I dunno, I do think donors deserve transparency, but I know that sometimes sales agreements have clauses that the price can't be disclosed...
I think we know that, it's LZ. MD's posts were all about raising funds to buy the main owner out, not the rest of the syndicateIt's not so much the amount of money as to whom the money has gone to
I think we know that, it's LZ. MD's posts were all about raising funds to buy the main owner out, not the rest of
D'oh, this would make senseAlso, I think this is why LZ is now posting that she has parted ways with MD - because she's now been paid and is no longer an owner.