Pro hunting lobby spending spree

The current situation makes it difficult to reach the evidence needed for proof. One judge commented along those lines and acquitted someone who he believed was guilty but the act was flawed.

If it was illegal to use animal scents then any hunt found to have used it could be prosecuted without the ambiguity of whether hounds were deliberately or accidentally following a fox. If the hounds were trained to follow an artificial scent like drag hounds are then genuine accidents would be less likely which surely everyone wants to avoid.
I don't know enough about foxhounds to comment really, but I should think they would still be liable to go after a fox even if trained on another scent. I certainly think there would be enough of a question mark about it for the ambiguity to still largely be present. It would probably depend on how the trail was laid - drag hunts follow very distinct lines rather than the winding around type trails that the trail hunts use, where the grey area of, um, misadventure, is far more likely.
 
I don't know enough about foxhounds to comment really, but I should think they would still be liable to go after a fox even if trained on another scent. I certainly think there would be enough of a question mark about it for the ambiguity to still largely be present. It would probably depend on how the trail was laid - drag hunts follow very distinct lines rather than the winding around type trails that the trail hunts use, where the grey area of, um, misadventure, is far more likely.

So it might not help with accidents but if a hunt has laid a fox scent illegally then there would be no ambiguity.
 
I really hope if hunts clean up their act and behave that the rent a mob sabs can then be dealt with. They dont bother bloodhound packs or similar, they dont seem to bother hunts that arent hunting foxes, so it should then just stop.
They very rarely bother foot hunts which suggests to me that either a) they are basically lazy and are put off by the country foot hunts cover or b) it's the horses they object to.
 
I have no skin in the game because I dont hunt - but I do live near the kennels of one of the hunts & the hounds are happy and well cared for. Until my yard road became a rat run it was used as an exercise route and all hounds were in good condition.

It also impressed me how the kennel team had such good control on exercise.

Yes they see vets if needed. Yes they are euthanised if they can't hunt and can't be rehomed. Some go back to their puppy walkers on retirement. I have no issue with that.

It is a kennel set up obviously but then so is the set up of a friend who is a professional breeder with all the relevant council checks. Her ex breeding dogs rarely get rehomed to families either because they miss their pack - it's why she has an absurd number of retirees!
 
Someone I know with working dogs once said to me, with a straight face "we don't believe in vets". I'd guess hounds don't get treatment for anything either.
I don’t think you can extrapolate from speaking to one owner of working dogs to then judging that every single hound pack in the country has the same approach! Like everything there is going to be a range of good and bad in the sector.
 
Top