fburton
Well-Known Member
The difference is that the RSPCA has the financial means to pursue prosecutions whereas members of the public don't generally speaking.The RSPCA can and do privately prosecute. Yes, they have no powers afforded to them, but you or I could act under the law and take a private prosecution with Joe Bloggs down the road who battered his pooch to death.
Another difference, then, is that the police are more likely to act on requests from the RSPCA than on requests from members of the public?However, YorksG also hasn't mentioned that quite often PACE Section 17 (power of entry) and Section 19 (Seizure) can and are used by police on RSPCA request in order to remove animals. In this case, no vet is needed whatsoever.
Given these differences, I think it is fair to say that the RSPCA's "powers" -- in the sense of capabilities rather than legal rights, of course -- are considerably more than what you or I have.
They have no more power than you or I.
So this is debatable.