Nancykitt
Well-Known Member
Having read a lot recently about horse purchases that haven't gone well, I started to think about the extent to which sellers and buyers consider suitability.
Someone commented on the Dodgy Dealers page that the dealer had seen the buyer ride the horse and gave the opinion that it was a good match. Turns out it wasn't and they were having some trouble returning and getting a refund. One person commented that it is the dealer's job to sell and in no way should they be responsible for ensuring that the horse is suitable for the buyer; that responsibility lies 100% with the buyer.
As someone who has no real experience of selling horses, I was just wondering if there is a general consensus on this.
Does the seller have any responsibility (moral/ethical rather than legal) to make sure that the buyer is a good match for the horse, as far as they can tell?
In your view, is it different for dealers compared to private sales?
When I bought AJ, the dealer selling him knew about my (lack of) riding ability and the sort of thing I was after because she'd seen me out hunting on a number of occasions. She steered me away from my first choice of a pretty dappled grey coblet (so glad she did!) and offered little AJ on a two-week trial period, which included a day's hunting. I was slightly dubious about taking on such a young pony but she said that she was 99% sure he'd be good for me. And she was right. But I appreciate that not everyone can possibly know the background of those who come to view a horse...how do you assess suitability?
It also seems that there is a lot of buying unseen, with buyers relying totally on the sellers' description. I know some dealers are brutally honest and then say that if things go wrong it's basically the buyer's fault.
Thankfully I'm not looking to buy as we have Ozzy now - tbh, from what I'm reading, buying and selling horses looks to be a bit of a nightmare at the moment!
Just interested in people's views.
Someone commented on the Dodgy Dealers page that the dealer had seen the buyer ride the horse and gave the opinion that it was a good match. Turns out it wasn't and they were having some trouble returning and getting a refund. One person commented that it is the dealer's job to sell and in no way should they be responsible for ensuring that the horse is suitable for the buyer; that responsibility lies 100% with the buyer.
As someone who has no real experience of selling horses, I was just wondering if there is a general consensus on this.
Does the seller have any responsibility (moral/ethical rather than legal) to make sure that the buyer is a good match for the horse, as far as they can tell?
In your view, is it different for dealers compared to private sales?
When I bought AJ, the dealer selling him knew about my (lack of) riding ability and the sort of thing I was after because she'd seen me out hunting on a number of occasions. She steered me away from my first choice of a pretty dappled grey coblet (so glad she did!) and offered little AJ on a two-week trial period, which included a day's hunting. I was slightly dubious about taking on such a young pony but she said that she was 99% sure he'd be good for me. And she was right. But I appreciate that not everyone can possibly know the background of those who come to view a horse...how do you assess suitability?
It also seems that there is a lot of buying unseen, with buyers relying totally on the sellers' description. I know some dealers are brutally honest and then say that if things go wrong it's basically the buyer's fault.
Thankfully I'm not looking to buy as we have Ozzy now - tbh, from what I'm reading, buying and selling horses looks to be a bit of a nightmare at the moment!
Just interested in people's views.