Shark Hanlon

Clodagh

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2005
Messages
26,652
Location
Devon
Visit site

Juliet987654

New User
Joined
5 September 2024
Messages
1
Visit site
hey agre that owner responsibily is crucial.its sad when horse are treatd like objects rather than livng beings its importan for us as a comunity to support each other and educate other about horse welfare.remeber each of us can make a diference ;)
 

nutjob

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 August 2021
Messages
1,176
Visit site
If it's the same horse as the one on dodgy dealers she did look very reluctant to move in the video and to me didn't look sound, especially for a fit TB which had recently raced, but she wasn't emaciated at the trainers. It's not clear if she's lost all this weight before leaving Ireland or if the British dealer who allegedly only had the horse 5/6 days before selling her on in this state bears some of the responsibility. There's several people who have failed this horse and it does seem like the trainers are given the bulk of the blame and owners of racehorses are not held up for same amount of scrutiny as other horse owners in these cases.
 

nutjob

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 August 2021
Messages
1,176
Visit site
The video of the horse is on X (twitter) under "Shark Hanlon Training" but I can't see the persons original tweet about the horse as that profile needs you to be an approved follower to view.
 

Clodagh

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2005
Messages
26,652
Location
Devon
Visit site
It needs racing to educate owners as to their responsibility for the horse, be that one owner with 200 horses or someone who owns 10% and I think that owners should have to pay into a fund or lodge money in advance so that they cannot just walk away and leave it to the trainer, often owing money.
Completely. I own micro shares with two syndicate companies and both offer end of career care.
I’ve also just bought a small percentage in two others and first found out what the syndicate managers plans were when they retire. Everyone should do that.
 
Last edited:

humblepie

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2008
Messages
7,155
Visit site
Completely. I own micro shares with two syndicate companies and both offer end of career care.
I’ve also just bought a small percentage in two others and first found out what the syndicate managers plans were when they retire. Everyone should do that.

That is really good. The syndicate agreement/code of conduct (can't remember which or both) does cover the syndicate having an after racing/retirement plan for the horse. People asking like you have done will only help the process.
 

Crazy_cat_lady

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 January 2012
Messages
7,543
Visit site

And another thing!!

I struggled with the ITV documentary as knew from comments on here he wasn't sweetness and lies, yet it was very much promoting him how great it was the underdog won (I thought that at the time)

I think all connections bare responsibility for what happens to a horse at the end of its career and authorities need to place greater emphasis on this with stricter regulations. I feel you can tell a lot the trainers that care as they're the ones who use non racing agreements, have pages dedicated to their ex racers and new careers

Owners too, should have greater responsibility, they're the ones who used the horse for that purpose, so when it can no longer fulfill that purpose, they need to take more responsibility for the next step.

Look at Godolphins retirement scheme, more of the big owners should fund those, there's a massive flat yard, who often sacrifices horses with lovely breeding as pacemakers, with billionaire owners who have enough horses to write off some, would be interesting to see what happens to the pacemakers etc at the end of their career....
 

bonny

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 September 2007
Messages
6,700
Visit site

And another thing!!

I struggled with the ITV documentary as knew from comments on here he wasn't sweetness and lies, yet it was very much promoting him how great it was the underdog won (I thought that at the time)

I think all connections bare responsibility for what happens to a horse at the end of its career and authorities need to place greater emphasis on this with stricter regulations. I feel you can tell a lot the trainers that care as they're the ones who use non racing agreements, have pages dedicated to their ex racers and new careers

Owners too, should have greater responsibility, they're the ones who used the horse for that purpose, so when it can no longer fulfill that purpose, they need to take more responsibility for the next step.

Look at Godolphins retirement scheme, more of the big owners should fund those, there's a massive flat yard, who often sacrifices horses with lovely breeding as pacemakers, with billionaire owners who have enough horses to write off some, would be interesting to see what happens to the pacemakers etc at the end of their career....
Do you think everyone who owns a horse is responsible for where it ends up, maybe months or years later ?
 

humblepie

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2008
Messages
7,155
Visit site
British racing is looking at traceability from birth for whole life but agree as you say there does feel a point when the horse isn’t racing’s responsibility - for instance a 15 year old who raced once then evented for ten years. Just a discussion thought.
 
Last edited:

reynold

Well-Known Member
Joined
8 August 2007
Messages
2,024
Visit site

bonny

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 September 2007
Messages
6,700
Visit site

bonny

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 September 2007
Messages
6,700
Visit site
I was thinking how can anyone be a fan of someone who cuts microchips out of live horses!
I don’t know him and I’ve no idea what he’s like apart from how he comes across on the tv but he’s facing a ban for transporting a dead horse not for anything else.
 
Top