adamntitch
Well-Known Member
No wonder they thought it was skinny all there other equines look obese
He wasn't really rescued in the true sense of the word; the owner admits buying him.
I have to say I wish people would also comment with uproar on the horses who are so grossly obese at 3 and 4 years old! A heavy horse does not have to be a barrel on legs, trust me I had one that was eventing fit and I regularly used to get asked "shouldn't you let him have more weight on". He's 21 now and still a lean build for a clydesdale but not in any way worrying. We live in a world where seeing a hint of a rib is a welfare case but carrying 100+kilos spare is cute/cuddly/loved/desired.
I have seen pictures and thought it looked weak and poor for a youngster but not dangerously thin. I have seen worse in breeders yards! I do wonder what they paid for it, if it was out competing it won't have gone for meat money!
Where are people seeing all this can't find it anywhere
And all the hysteria over him being terrified and showing the whites of his eye, anyone else think he just has a ‘human’ eye that side which naturally shows more sclera? Most photos are of his right side
Someone has posted a comment under the picture of two cobs with the rescue pointing out that they are obese enough to be a welfare case- was that someone on here?! They are shockingly fat, and the rescue talk about bringing them in for some 'spoiling' which I hope doesn't come in the form of food![]()
Oh they cobs are fat as!
Luckily they are all generally a hardy type so rugs aren't required.Thank you very much for the individuals here who have provided information re. heavy horses - as an aside, wow, imagine the rug bill for a horse that size that's still developing physically until 9!
They have a smaller surface area to volume ratio, so actually conserve heat better. A more finely built horse has a higher SA to Vol ratio, so lose heat quicker.Thank you. I presumed, simply by being larger horses and thereby having more surface area through which to lose heat, they'd be likely to require rugging.
No, there's less surface area in a bigger horse. (ETA: Oops, Congrat beat me to it.)Thank you. I presumed, simply by being larger horses and thereby having more surface area through which to lose heat, they'd be likely to require rugging.
Yea…cobs much worse than the Clyde![]()
And blocked posters…I see they deleted the comments about the horses being fat.