claireandnadia
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry, I think I fall into the 'snobbery' section.Many happy hackers I'm afraid IMHO aren't the best riders, some may be but if all you do is hack, in my book that means you can't ride a horse in terms of getting a performance from it. If that makes sense. Competitive riders hone their position, their aids etc etc. Happy hackers wouldn't do this correct?
I suppose it depends on what your definition of a good rider is... Some one who sits on a horse and walks around can sit on a horse, it does not mean they can ride. I could put my non horsey OH on a horse for a hack, does not mean he can ride!
If said horse starts pratting about (on a hack) and the rider can control it, not lose balance, get back in control quickly, sit to spooks etc, then yes they may be a good rider.
Having said that, I don't think there is anything wrong with happy hackers, whatever makes you happy! Just don't pretend you know everything about higher standards of riding, schooling etc
When I first read this I was quite offended as I came in to riding at the age of 26, I wanted to be a happy hacker and I am and always will be a happy hacker.
But, I don't know how to ride as would a rider who competes SJ/dressage etc and quite frankly have no interest in doing that but that doesn't mean we can't ride, we still have to have certain skills and the foundations are still the same no matter what you are doing with horses.