CorvusCorax
Deary me...
I see this statement a lot and it makes me chuckle. Yes, obviously, some people are drawn to certain types of dogs because they have tiny wotsits and they think it will make them look hard and make them be feared by people.
These days it is bull breeds but back in the day it was 'Alsaaaaaaayshuns'.
In fact, if you look at such esteemed organs as Sky News' comments feature or the letters pages of the tabloids, you still will find people of the opinion that anyone who owns a Shep, Rott, Staff or Dobe is a chav who wants to look hard and that they should all be shot and that if we want a dog, we should all own collies and labs because they NEVER do ANYTHING wrong (no offence to any collie or lab owners, but it is a sentiment which has been aired before, just using it as an example.
Which got me to thinking - I remember going to a seminar years ago by a man called Brian Wootton who is a breed historian and wrote IMO one of the best books on the breed, who said 'none of us in this room were initially attracted to the breed because of character, it's the look that drew us in first, before we found out all the wonderful traits and the adaptability'.
And he was right, in a way, you look at a dog before you ever know what it is like on the inside.
However my mother and I both write, professionally, indeed, she was a librarian.
The man we bought our dogs off owns an electrical company.
The man we bought our last bitch off, makes shrouds.
The lady we bought the female before that from, was a sheep farmer.
I also know undertakers and doctors and graphic designers who own GSDs - we can't all of us, have this type of dog because we want to 'look hard'?
Any thoughts? I know it's a Saturday night ramble (my best mate blew me out, the cow!!!) but I'd love perhaps especially Staff owners to air their views, bearing in mind comments on another thread.
These days it is bull breeds but back in the day it was 'Alsaaaaaaayshuns'.
In fact, if you look at such esteemed organs as Sky News' comments feature or the letters pages of the tabloids, you still will find people of the opinion that anyone who owns a Shep, Rott, Staff or Dobe is a chav who wants to look hard and that they should all be shot and that if we want a dog, we should all own collies and labs because they NEVER do ANYTHING wrong (no offence to any collie or lab owners, but it is a sentiment which has been aired before, just using it as an example.
Which got me to thinking - I remember going to a seminar years ago by a man called Brian Wootton who is a breed historian and wrote IMO one of the best books on the breed, who said 'none of us in this room were initially attracted to the breed because of character, it's the look that drew us in first, before we found out all the wonderful traits and the adaptability'.
And he was right, in a way, you look at a dog before you ever know what it is like on the inside.
However my mother and I both write, professionally, indeed, she was a librarian.
The man we bought our dogs off owns an electrical company.
The man we bought our last bitch off, makes shrouds.
The lady we bought the female before that from, was a sheep farmer.
I also know undertakers and doctors and graphic designers who own GSDs - we can't all of us, have this type of dog because we want to 'look hard'?
Any thoughts? I know it's a Saturday night ramble (my best mate blew me out, the cow!!!) but I'd love perhaps especially Staff owners to air their views, bearing in mind comments on another thread.