SilverLinings
Well-Known Member
I agree with you about the problem with the DDA and banned breeds list- I thought I was fairly clued up about dogs but didn't know there were exceptions that meant you could keep one, which shows how easily it can be misunderstood. And as we've seen from all the recent dog attacks the list doesn't stop these things happening. I suppose unless we ban all breeds with a certain bite strength and/or of a certain size (I am NOT advocating this) we are still going to have fatal attacks as it seems that the government can't legislate to prevent ignorant owners not making sure they have control of their dogs. It would probably be more helpful if there was a way of legislating how people treat/train/care for their dogs to prevent the aggressive behaviour, but I don't know how you'd police it or what rules you could put in place.
I wonder if going at the problem sideways by making welfare requirements for dogs much more strict, and policing them better, would put some of the less suitable owners off bothering to get a dog in the first place? I suspect many of the less responsible owners would be put off if owning a dog required more thought and more work (i.e. the amount responsible owners already put in).
I wonder if going at the problem sideways by making welfare requirements for dogs much more strict, and policing them better, would put some of the less suitable owners off bothering to get a dog in the first place? I suspect many of the less responsible owners would be put off if owning a dog required more thought and more work (i.e. the amount responsible owners already put in).