CanteringCarrot
Well-Known Member
Edit: never mind... I'm going to offend someone and don't want to deal with it.
Last edited:
i see this all the time, really hacks me off. So many people advertising broken mares to be used as broodmares. Also, the mares that are never ridden but bred from. That to me is just bizarre. Surely you want to know the rideability of a mare if you intend to have her within your breeding programme ?
Some of course will be fine , but there must be stacks of non ridden mares that have dodgy rideability / soundness issues that just aren’t picked up . I can’t see why people don’t back them , see what they’ve got and then put them into the broodmare herd . mine have had a career/ been under saddle and then been bred from . It really helps me when choosing a stallion .I normally think the same, but then I think about all of the Spanish mares that aren't ridden, both historically and in presently. The Spanish have produced many a fine horse, to include ridden horses, and mares typically weren't for riding.
I have aimed to breed a sport type RC level/family horse. There is a real shortage of this type of horse, I think. She is 9 months old now, has lots of bone - a sturdy type. Fairly nondescript colouring - bright bay. I tested her mother (TB x Oldenburg) for every genetic fault that might be relevant. Sire is a grade one connemara who already had young on the ground that I could see. So far, so good and it will be interesting to see how she turns out. I spent two years playing with ideas for a stallion - with AI you can pick spectacular stallions from across Europe but in the end sense prevailed and I chose something less spectacular but hopefully useful.Personally I would never breed anything with a suspect hereditary/genetic or conformational issue on either side. The hyperflexion really bothers me as has become so pronounced in recent years.
An interesting topic for sure… It seems hard to find a nice straightforward type these days (going by issues friends have had and the large number of lameness posts you see about young/5 stage vetted purchases needing retirement) and I've often thought the sport type horses average RC level competitors rode back in my childhood were much sturdier, albeit less fantastic movers. Where did it all go wrong?
Some of course will be fine , but there must be stacks of non ridden mares that have dodgy rideability / soundness issues that just aren’t picked up . I can’t see why people don’t back them , see what they’ve got and then put them into the broodmare herd . mine have had a career/ been under saddle and then been bred from . It really helps me when choosing a stallion .
In fact my 2 that are due this year will both go back under saddle next year as I’m not putting any in foal this year
That's a rather inaccurate and strange interpretation of history. For a start many "British" horses used in both WW's were in fact Irish and therefore out of the scope of any influence other than purchase. American and Australian horses were also used by the military. The German army used far, far more horses, particularly at the beginning of WWII, and inspected them rigorously. German stud book Keurung inspections were initiated well before any UK organisation, and before either WW, and were infinitely more rigorous in scope.WW1 and WW2 solved a lot of the genetic issues in British horses. Anything with terrible feet, eyes or lame was shot for meat. Pretty much every horse was inspected by the army/Ministry of Agriculture during this time so it wiped out a huge amount of genetic issues in one go. The Germans did not do this so hence they have a fair few genetic issues, like the leptospirosis issue which seems to mainly affect German bred horses.
Actually up until quite recently mares were used extensively for other jobs around the farm, such as threshing (which is where the cobra tradition comes from, where mares are hitched together with a neck collar in a side-by-side line and worked in a circle), driving, and for ladies and children to ride. It's really only on the largest studs where they are not ridden, and I can assure you any mare with a bad temperament would be out lickety split. All the Yeguada Miltar mares are broken to ride and there are nearly as many mares as geldings (and fewer stallions) in Doma Vaquera. On my last buying trip to Spain I looked at I'd say a 60/40 split stallions/mares, and bought a ridden mare. Stallions are not gelded because they don't cause problems, simple: Spanish horses (in Spain) are properly handled, more robustly expected to behave, and have IMO lovely temperaments. Riding horses are also mostly kept stabled and not turned out in groups after being broken.I totally agree with and support the mare having a career or at least being ridden.
It's entirely possibly that some things within the Spanish horse could've been prevented or improved upon if mares were ridden (more are nowadays). I find them to be an extremely rideable horse in general though, but that's with the right type of person.
I will say, even though many of the mares were never ridden horses, the Spanish have created one heck of a horse and I've never had any other horse(s) like them. Could some health/soundness issues within the breed be better? Yes. I'd argue that for many breeds though, even those with a higher percentage of ridden mares.
I know a lot of it is my bias here, but I give the Spanish a little bit of slack with the ridden mare thing. Maybe more than I should, I don't know.
As to why mares weren't backed, it goes back to some level of tradition I believe (paging @Cortez because she probably knows more!). It also ties into why so many male horses are/were left intact, even if they were not used for breeding. Basically the horses were often gifts or used in parades or other events, and a stallion would be the most suitable mount for a king if you were to gift a king or noble a horse. They can have more presence too.
I'm summing it up and probably doing a shite job at it
Actually up until quite recently mares were used extensively for other jobs around the farm, such as threshing (which is where the cobra tradition comes from, where mares are hitched together with a neck collar in a side-by-side line and worked in a circle), driving, and for ladies and children to ride. It's really only on the largest studs where they are not ridden, and I can assure you any mare with a bad temperament would be out lickety split. All the Yeguada Miltar mares are broken to ride and there are nearly as many mares as geldings (and fewer stallions) in Doma Vaquera. On my last buying trip to Spain I looked at I'd say a 60/40 split stallions/mares, and bought a ridden mare. Stallions are not gelded because they don't cause problems, simple: Spanish horses (in Spain) are properly handled, more robustly expected to behave, and have IMO lovely temperaments. Riding horses are also mostly kept stabled and not turned out in groups after being broken.
Ah I always wondered where the cobra came from! Thank you for the input.Actually up until quite recently mares were used extensively for other jobs around the farm, such as threshing (which is where the cobra tradition comes from, where mares are hitched together with a neck collar in a side-by-side line and worked in a circle), driving, and for ladies and children to ride. It's really only on the largest studs where they are not ridden, and I can assure you any mare with a bad temperament would be out lickety split. All the Yeguada Miltar mares are broken to ride and there are nearly as many mares as geldings (and fewer stallions) in Doma Vaquera. On my last buying trip to Spain I looked at I'd say a 60/40 split stallions/mares, and bought a ridden mare. Stallions are not gelded because they don't cause problems, simple: Spanish horses (in Spain) are properly handled, more robustly expected to behave, and have IMO lovely temperaments. Riding horses are also mostly kept stabled and not turned out in groups after being broken.
Of course other horses were used by military depending on nationality, but pretty much every horse was inspected for use particularly ww1 in UK. Regular riding horses were compulsory purchased for the army if adequate. At outbreak of war the British Army had 25k horses so needed an awful lot more. They were all inspected as like humans were inspected for flat feet etc, no point taking broken horses. Nothing under 15hh was taken.That's a rather inaccurate and strange interpretation of history. For a start many "British" horses used in both WW's were in fact Irish and therefore out of the scope of any influence other than purchase. American and Australian horses were also used by the military. The German army used far, far more horses, particularly at the beginning of WWII, and inspected them rigorously. German stud book Keurung inspections were initiated well before any UK organisation, and before either WW, and were infinitely more rigorous in scope.
I'm not aware of the lepto issue, can you elaborate?
If something is found in one distinct population of horses and not in another it's precisely because they are separate, nothing to do with world wars. And it's not like EVERY horse in Germany has eye problems, and no horse in the UK has eye problems. Just as Connemaras have a prevalent hoof condition, Appaloosas often suffer from night blindness, and so on. That's how genetics works.This is what eliminated a lot of genetic issues and particularly eye problems which are seen in continental horses. Its a fact and one I have discussed recently with a world leading equine eye specialist on why something is found in German horses and not UK.
Of course other horses were used by military depending on nationality, but pretty much every horse was inspected for use particularly ww1 in UK. Regular riding horses were compulsory purchased for the army if adequate. At outbreak of war the British Army had 25k horses so needed an awful lot more. They were all inspected as like humans were inspected for flat feet etc, no point taking broken horses. Nothing under 15hh was taken.
War Horses: Britain’s Equine Army of the First World War - Nerdalicious
The First World War is viewed as the first truly mechanised war and the horrific effects of gas, artillery and machine gun against the frailties of human flesh have been well documented over the last century. However, it was also the war of the horse: from mounting cavalry charges and pulling...nerdalicious.com.au
This is what eliminated a lot of genetic issues and particularly eye problems which are seen in continental horses. Its a fact and one I have discussed recently with a world leading equine eye specialist on why something is found in German horses and not UK.
Me neither, and I used to be very involved in breeding German WB's and the körung process.Is there a specific eye condition or conditions that we're talking about here?
Having lived in Germany, I cannot recall any prolific eye conditions. I still have friends in various (German) breeding circles.
This could be something I just didn't notice, but I haven't heard of this before, so I'm just curious.
Well, precisely: that's the reason for my question. Interested in the answer.Lepto is the scientific name for weils disease from rats so not sure how it links in as horses can get it in the UK.
Leptospirosis - 15-20% of German warmbloods will have it with problems.Is there a specific eye condition or conditions that we're talking about here?
Having lived in Germany, I cannot recall any prolific eye conditions. I still have friends in various (German) breeding circles.
This could be something I just didn't notice, but I haven't heard of this before, so I'm just curious.
What was eliminated? What you are saying doesn't make much sense, and where are the statistics that you're referencing? I've spent a large part of my life involved with German WBs, and I've never heard of a case of lepto amongst them (I realise that's not a scientific sample). In fact the only cases of leptospirosis in horses I've ever seen have been in the UK (also not scientifically significant).Leptospirosis - 15-20% of German warmbloods will have it with problems.
Very very rare in UK - all horses will have a level of lepto in their system but it seems German warmbloods are prone to real issues and my vet who travels around Europe doing purely eyes recounted the reason being ww1 being the reason it was pretty much eradicated in Uk population
I have added published work. The prevalence of Lepto in UK vs Germany causing issues with ERU.What was eliminated? What you are saying doesn't make much sense, and where are the statistics that you're referencing? I've spent a large part of my life involved with German WBs, and I've never heard of a case of lepto amongst them (I realise that's not a scientific sample). In fact the only cases of leptospirosis in horses I've ever seen have been in the UK (also not scientifically significant).
Leptospirosis - 15-20% of German warmbloods will have it with problems.
Very very rare in UK - all horses will have a level of lepto in their system but it seems German warmbloods are prone to real issues and my vet who travels around Europe doing purely eyes recounted the reason being ww1 being the reason it was pretty much eradicated in Uk population.
My regular vet who is British team vet and USA team vet hadn’t ever encountered it before.