lizstuguinness
Well-Known Member
I had a thought the other day when glancing through for sale ads.
My horse was sold a few months ago, while I had her she had a bizzar lameness, turned out it was only mud fever (during a very dry june?) any way insurance then excluded her entire hind leg.
When her new owners come to insure her, (as i provided her full vets history) therecitaly this exclusion should carry on through, as under any policy all known history should be declared.
If I was to buy another horse, I would want to know its history however if you didnt decalre this to the insurance, and a claim was made, then subsequently it was found out you knew about an exsisting claim on this area of the horse, technicaly they can ask for their money back.
Makes you wonder if you could ever buy a horse which has many exclusions so its not worth buying/insuring.
perhaps a way around this would be to find out about its current exclusions that way you dont know of vet history but it may give you a general idea?
sorry ramdon thoughts!
My horse was sold a few months ago, while I had her she had a bizzar lameness, turned out it was only mud fever (during a very dry june?) any way insurance then excluded her entire hind leg.
When her new owners come to insure her, (as i provided her full vets history) therecitaly this exclusion should carry on through, as under any policy all known history should be declared.
If I was to buy another horse, I would want to know its history however if you didnt decalre this to the insurance, and a claim was made, then subsequently it was found out you knew about an exsisting claim on this area of the horse, technicaly they can ask for their money back.
Makes you wonder if you could ever buy a horse which has many exclusions so its not worth buying/insuring.
perhaps a way around this would be to find out about its current exclusions that way you dont know of vet history but it may give you a general idea?
sorry ramdon thoughts!