Pale Rider
Well-Known Member
Nice one Sticker.
I just don't understand why this is such an emotive subject.
If you what your horse shod fine .
If you work your horse BF fine .
If you have your horse BF work it BF sometimes in boots sometimes fine,
If you use boots all the time when the horse is working fine,
If you have your BF some of the time in boots sometimes and shod part of the year fine.
But why do people object to people asking questions on this subject if you don't believe that horses can work without shoes why bother if others do its not affecting you is it.
Horses where not born with shoes on so I fail to a see why keeping them without shoes causes such a bun fight.
You know I don't really mind what anyone else does with their own horses I don't care whether you call it BF unshod or anything else .
Do I think it's good people can questions about BF thinking yes it's great to read about what others do and think ,why should people not debate this if you don't like it dont read it.
I don't think she was sore but her toe was, I would say dumped but I'm not sure if it's the correct term. You could see the laminar .... where the hoof was dark, the dumped part was white.
That was my thought too, the horse is not wearing its feet down due to being barefoot but due to its gait, and this needs investigating.The horse was dragging its toes and wearing off the front?
Personally I would want to find out why she was doing that, it's got nowt to do with being barefoot, other that it allowed it to be obvious in the hoof wear.
I just don't understand why this is such an emotive subject.
If you what your horse shod fine .
If you work your horse BF fine .
If you have your horse BF work it BF sometimes in boots sometimes fine,
If you use boots all the time when the horse is working fine,
If you have your BF some of the time in boots sometimes and shod part of the year fine.
But why do people object to people asking questions on this subject if you don't believe that horses can work without shoes why bother if others do its not affecting you is it.
Horses where not born with shoes on so I fail to a see why keeping them without shoes causes such a bun fight.
You know I don't really mind what anyone else does with their own horses I don't care whether you call it BF unshod or anything else .
Do I think it's good people can questions about BF thinking yes it's great to read about what others do and think ,why should people not debate this if you don't like it dont read it.
Who knows... that's barefoot for you![]()
It is a personal opinion, I know of many who have had it but I wouldn't chose it for mine, the same as I wouldnt feel right with him being on constant pain relief for the rest of his life just to satisfy my needs.
It is not changing what is happening, merely disguising it or slowing it down for a short period of time and I am not comfortable with that. It seems to be proven that there is a high percentage of halting the degeneration of navicular without drugs which I am much more up for trying.
But for any treatment, we clearly need a bottomless pit of money.... Or a money tree!
How can it be wrong to give a horse a treatment that will make him more comfortable. What else do you suggest I do? Shoot a happy horse who just happens to have degenerating joints (that he isn't even lame on)? If I was doing it so that I could put him back in full work and gallop the legs off him, then it would be morally wrong, but I am doing it to give a lovely horse a chance at a longer and more comfortable life. So shoot me for trying to do the best by him.
Thanks to everybody who contributed. Along with some of you I would love to see some properly measured results comparing unshod rehabilitation with remedial farriery. Information is empowering after all.
Gosh, I went off to work for a few hours and you all carried on without me!
Thanks to everybody who contributed. Along with some of you I would love to see some properly measured results comparing unshod rehabilitation with remedial farriery. Information is empowering after all.
Have you looked at the Rockley Farm site?
I am aware of what they do there and I see they claim a degree of success without actually promising or guaranteeing improvement. Good for them, if what they are doing works, but it isn't actually measureable.
I am aware of what they do there and I see they claim a degree of success without actually promising or guaranteeing improvement. Good for them, if what they are doing works, but it isn't actually measureable.
Of course it is measureable! How else would you propose to collect the information that people keep claiming they want to see?!
It would need to be a properly controlled comparison I think, with Xrays prior to rehab, and then a follow up 4-6 months later with equal numbers of horses in the 'barefoot rehab' group against conventional remedial farrier.
Apart from the FRC I can't think of anybody who might be interested in sponsoring it though
It would need to be a properly controlled comparison I think, with Xrays prior to rehab, and then a follow up 4-6 months later with equal numbers of horses in the 'barefoot rehab' group against conventional remedial farrier.
Apart from the FRC I can't think of anybody who might be interested in sponsoring it though
And why is a horse that has been through remedial shoeing without success and then is brought sound by Rockley not considered to be it's own control? They have an impressive number of these. How else would you propose to conduct a controlled comparison? Induce navicular in a group of genetically identical horses and then treat them differently?!
I'm sorry, but when people start banging on about the lack of scientific evidence for the efficacy of barefoot, it just seems to me that they are sticking their fingers in their ears and singing la la la very loudly.
How can it be wrong to give a horse a treatment that will make him more comfortable. What else do you suggest I do? Shoot a happy horse who just happens to have degenerating joints (that he isn't even lame on)? If I was doing it so that I could put him back in full work and gallop the legs off him, then it would be morally wrong, but I am doing it to give a lovely horse a chance at a longer and more comfortable life. So shoot me for trying to do the best by him.
Oh thank the gods! A voice of reason!
I am aware of what they do there and I see they claim a degree of success without actually promising or guaranteeing improvement. Good for them, if what they are doing works, but it isn't actually measureable.
One could argue that the very number of remedial farriers suggests that there must be some value to the additional training and greater skill, if they weren't getting results surely nobody would bother with the training, or with using them? What I would like to know is how they compare in terms of success
If they have a degenerative joints and are not lame, what is the need for treatment.... Nature is/has taken its course.
Like I said, it is purely a personal opinion I do not judge those that choose these options Nor do I wish to be judged myself. My boy is only 14 and at his prime and I would love to continue his dressage and his jumping, but this is for my benefit and he could potentially be on danilon for 10 + years and that is something I have a problem with. I would rather he was comfortable enough to hack which he enjoys than pumping him full of drugs to compete him for my benefit. Perhaps I would think differently if he were in his late teens/twenties and he needed pain relief to continue the odd poodle round the block for his remaining few years, but that is not the case.