Trailer Test to be Abandoned

If they'd done this back in 2016 or early 2017, I could have justified a pick-up truck instead of the Yeti.

Next car I get....Hilux, here I come!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kat
I’m wondering if there will be any benefit to those that passed their B+E for example, insurance or something or other? I also feel incredibly sad for those that have built up their livelihoods to support those completing b+e. Feels like quite a u-turn!
 
Melody Grey said:
I wonder (optimistically) if this might bring down the second hand value of 3.5t boxes a bit? ...on the basis that there’s now another option for those not wanting to do a test of some kind.
Click to expand...

They do seem to be coming down price wise anyway, so perhaps this will push them down more. I’d prefer a 3.5 over a trailer, means I don’t have to swap my car!
 
Last edited:
TPO said:
My understanding is that once the test is scraped you can tow exactly what pre 97 and b+e licensed drivers can now.
Click to expand...
I don't think it's exactly the same. Pre 1997 can tow a combination up to 8,250kg, whereas post 1997 will be towing a trailer with a MAM of 3,500kg.
 
Fruitcake said:
I don't think it's exactly the same. Pre 1997 can tow a combination up to 8,250kg, whereas post 1997 will be towing a trailer with a MAM of 3,500kg.
Click to expand...

I'll double check but I read it that once tests are scraped everyone has the same towing allowances (for want of a better word).

There is no test to allow you to tow more so surely it has to be an equal field?

...away to read gov site again
 
TPO said:
I'll double check but I read it that once tests are scraped everyone has the same towing allowances (for want of a better word).

There is no test to allow you to tow more so surely it has to be an equal field?

...away to read gov site again
Click to expand...
I think it differs as pre 1997 can drive a 7.5ton vehicle with a trailer where as post 1997 can’t and have to do a separate test to drive a 7.5ton
 
Did I read somewhere that HGV to-be drivers will not need to learn to reverse? Because making the test easier to pass will mean more drivers passing and the current shortage of drivers rectified?
 
Curveball… how is this actually going to solve the problem?

I chose to do my Cat C instead of B+E because I felt more comfortable driving a rigid vehicle. On that logic I figure a lot of the people taking B+E are choosing it over C/C1 for a reason.

So yes, this may free up more test slots but it won’t necessarily mean more people will actually want to do their C/C+E…..
Surely it would be better to give the option to go straight for C+E, a bit like how you can choose between C/C1

just idle thoughts ?
 
If I’m honest I didn’t read this link, my comment was based on the summary DVSA posted yesterday

ETA: had a quick read and I still can’t see it, am I being blind? (I’m tired!) ?
Either way, personally I wouldn’t want to do CE so it’s irrelevant but do think doing it this way is more valuable than scrapping the BE and maybe they need to look more into why people aren’t going down that route
 
donkeyindisguise said:
If I’m honest I didn’t read this link, my comment was based on the summary DVSA posted yesterday

ETA: had a quick read and I still can’t see it, am I being blind? (I’m tired!) ?
Either way, personally I wouldn’t want to do CE so it’s irrelevant but do think doing it this way is more valuable than scrapping the BE and maybe they need to look more into why people aren’t going down that route
Click to expand...
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-takes-further-action-to-tackle-hgv-driver-shortage
 
It's amazing how much attention is being focused on our industry at the moment and how little attention any of us drivers are getting
They speak to the guys in suits who profit from our endeavours but never actually ask drivers why folk don't want to do the job.
Putting drivers through their test quicker might get bums on seats initially but getting them to stay there is another thing.
A typical week involves 3x 15 hour shifts 1x 13 hour and on a Friday you might if you are lucky get a short 10 hour shift. A lot of companies will not understand why you don't want to work Saturdays.
It's 4 nights in the truck parking where you can..that's a total skill in itself and I'm not telling anyone any of my top secret hidey holes.
The showers and toilet facilities are for the most part disgusting...although one or two places are coming up trumps now but they are few and far between.
All medical appointments have to be on a Friday and without fail you find yourself skidding into the surgery with your blood pressure through the roof because you've just made it home in time.
Once they get these young bums on seats they are going to have to think long and hard about how to keep them there because I don't think they are going to put up with the crap we did. In the current climate at last they will have to listen to drivers.
 
I was thinking that too luckyoldme. It's never just about getting new people in, it shouldn't be. Same with nurses or teachers... the focus is always on recruiting new people where perhaps if the job was actually made more bearable to mere mortals and not requiring of some kind of super-humanity to keep at it for years on end then they wouldn't have to focus so much on getting people through the door! How many people are out there with all their driving qualifications but doing something else because they couldn't stand the pressures of the work? Or the toilets!
 
LoM until I "met" you on here, I thought 15 hour shifts and 58 hour weeks were illegal for HGV drivers. I'll bet that's true of most people.
.
 
ycbm said:
LoM until I "met" you on here, I thought 15 hour shifts and 58 hour weeks were illegal for HGV drivers. I'll bet that's true of most people.
.
Click to expand...
I actually did 58 hours last week because I had a new planner and it takes a while to learn how to run a driver..it's the shortest week Ive had in 3 years. Normally I'm doing 65.
The rules were originally designed as a maximum but they are viewed by most employers as a target.
They have trackers and computer programmes that tell them how many hours you have left. I always use my 15s up by Wednesday but last week it was strange ..I had a 15 and a 10 hour drive left for Friday which is amazing!
When I first started it wasnt unheard of to work for companies that were '99% legal' and we've all got our personal record of how long we stayed awake for.
 
PapaverFollis said:
I was thinking that too luckyoldme. It's never just about getting new people in, it shouldn't be. Same with nurses or teachers... the focus is always on recruiting new people where perhaps if the job was actually made more bearable to mere mortals and not requiring of some kind of super-humanity to keep at it for years on end then they wouldn't have to focus so much on getting people through the door! How many people are out there with all their driving qualifications but doing something else because they couldn't stand the pressures of the work? Or the toilets!
Click to expand...
Or lack of toilets. I got parked up for 15 hours last Monday with no toilets or showers...it really gets to you when your planner parks you up somewhere like that then goes off home to have a bath!
 
It is legally possible to do 84 hours in a week as a LGV driver
Week 1
15+15+15+13+13+13 = 84
Week 2
15+15+15+13+13 = 71
Repeat the two weeks above
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top