Storminateacup
Well-Known Member
From what I can see (according to current doctrines) grass is generally bad for horses.
Seems for barefoot you need little grass( no sugar) lots of hay and hard ground to condition the feet.
Yet short grass that has been rained on then sunshine on it for a few hours, or grass that has experienced a frost is high in sugar and therefore is BAD grass and causes laminitis.
So if short grass is BAD grass, do we put our horses in the fields with the long tough fibrous grasses that have gone to seed? If that is the way to do things why do I see so many horses, laminitics too, grazing the roots of the grass in near bare paddocks while the rest of the fields have over a foot of grass?
I have tried the "paddock paradise" method for barefoot,wherein you have a narrow path around your field, like a trackway ( the middle you save for winter when the grass has turned to starch, run to seed and dried out rather like hay) ) so the horse keep moving about all day with minimal grass. It a great idea in principle but still supplied too much grass for my fat boy.
So what about the past view of Grass being "Dr Green", and all the nutrients in grass being the perfect balance, (in the absence of the sugars presumably).
What do HHO users make of all this conflicting information and how do you, avoid laminitis, supply the nutrients in the grass, without giving grass, etc and condition hooves for barefoot, ie no sugar in diet.
There was a time when horses ate grass in the spring and summer, hay in the winter, were fat in summer, slimmer in winter. It used to be so simple.
Is it just commercialisation thats getting the better of us now?
opinions/comments ( on the back of a postage stamp! ) please
Seems for barefoot you need little grass( no sugar) lots of hay and hard ground to condition the feet.
Yet short grass that has been rained on then sunshine on it for a few hours, or grass that has experienced a frost is high in sugar and therefore is BAD grass and causes laminitis.
So if short grass is BAD grass, do we put our horses in the fields with the long tough fibrous grasses that have gone to seed? If that is the way to do things why do I see so many horses, laminitics too, grazing the roots of the grass in near bare paddocks while the rest of the fields have over a foot of grass?
I have tried the "paddock paradise" method for barefoot,wherein you have a narrow path around your field, like a trackway ( the middle you save for winter when the grass has turned to starch, run to seed and dried out rather like hay) ) so the horse keep moving about all day with minimal grass. It a great idea in principle but still supplied too much grass for my fat boy.
So what about the past view of Grass being "Dr Green", and all the nutrients in grass being the perfect balance, (in the absence of the sugars presumably).
What do HHO users make of all this conflicting information and how do you, avoid laminitis, supply the nutrients in the grass, without giving grass, etc and condition hooves for barefoot, ie no sugar in diet.
There was a time when horses ate grass in the spring and summer, hay in the winter, were fat in summer, slimmer in winter. It used to be so simple.
Is it just commercialisation thats getting the better of us now?
opinions/comments ( on the back of a postage stamp! ) please