LadySam
Well-Known Member
I would call that generosity, not a work ethic, but maybe it's just semantics?
Yes. I think it's just semantics. Or perhaps a catch-all term. If a person in their job turned up and did their job willingly or enthusiastically, did whatever was asked of them, tried hard and stayed until the work was done instead of running for the door asap, we'd bundle all those characteristics up into a neat bundle and call it a good work ethic.
There are horses who have similar characteristics, so I don't see why we can't describe horses as having a good work ethic. Of course it's silly to ascribe 'ethics' in the truest sense to a horse, but it's a descriptor we understand.
Some people want to debate how the horse has that ethic - has it been trained, is it a natural tendency, etc - but to me that is irrelevant in terms of using this description to describe a set of behaviours. Trying to figure out the horse's motivation is where the anthropomorphism can creep in, I think. As with people, whether someone's good work ethic was instilled in them by their parents, or if they were inspired by something else, or if they just like to be useful, it doesn't really matter. It's there or it isn't.
Last edited: