misskk88
Well-Known Member
Having read a lot of posts but not commented on them all, I have often read people describing a horse as nasty or dangerous.
To me there is a difference between the two. A dangerous horse may be so out of pain, fear, or instinct etc. With time, the right understanding and correct diagnosis, these horses usually can come good. A nasty horse will be one that is intentionally out to cause harm to human or other animal, thus also making it dangerous and usually it will never come completely good.
I think there seems to be a great confusion between the two, and I am getting more and more maddened by the amount of people that label their horses nasty or dangerous, with little understanding as to WHY they get the reaction they do. Rather than choose to evaluate what they have in front of them, the reasons for it through vet, farrier, experienced rider etc, they label it as a wrong'un and try to fob it off.
Now I know that is a sweeping generalisation and most horse owners are the exact opposite and have the horses best interests at heart! But truly, how many of you have met a nasty horse, rather than one that is labelled 'dangerous' or 'bad tempered' out of misunderstanding? I don't think I have ever met one that was truly nasty- I am talking all out to ensure you are hurt/killed. Naughty and dangerous behaviour has often been explained months down the line with diagnosis of pain or injury in those that have been described as nasty or dangerous.
I am not looking for a debate about what to do with these types of horses, as we all know what options there are and I don't want to turn this into a rehabilitate or pts argument! Just curious as to how many have met what they would call a genuinely 'nasty' horse?
To me there is a difference between the two. A dangerous horse may be so out of pain, fear, or instinct etc. With time, the right understanding and correct diagnosis, these horses usually can come good. A nasty horse will be one that is intentionally out to cause harm to human or other animal, thus also making it dangerous and usually it will never come completely good.
I think there seems to be a great confusion between the two, and I am getting more and more maddened by the amount of people that label their horses nasty or dangerous, with little understanding as to WHY they get the reaction they do. Rather than choose to evaluate what they have in front of them, the reasons for it through vet, farrier, experienced rider etc, they label it as a wrong'un and try to fob it off.
Now I know that is a sweeping generalisation and most horse owners are the exact opposite and have the horses best interests at heart! But truly, how many of you have met a nasty horse, rather than one that is labelled 'dangerous' or 'bad tempered' out of misunderstanding? I don't think I have ever met one that was truly nasty- I am talking all out to ensure you are hurt/killed. Naughty and dangerous behaviour has often been explained months down the line with diagnosis of pain or injury in those that have been described as nasty or dangerous.
I am not looking for a debate about what to do with these types of horses, as we all know what options there are and I don't want to turn this into a rehabilitate or pts argument! Just curious as to how many have met what they would call a genuinely 'nasty' horse?