diggerbez
Well-Known Member
i was just wondering if you have all insured your horses for their actual perceived value or not? V is currently insured for what i bought him as an unbacked 4 year old. i would like to think that his current market value is significantly more than that but have never changed it...the thinking was that if something happened then its at least enough money to buy myself another nice youngster...however, haven't got LOU on my policy as i just can't afford it (and was also stung in the past with an insurer refusing to pay LOU on a horse that could no longer do what it was insured to do)...so was wondering if its even worth me having V insured for anything over the minimum value. was just reading the other sad post about hayleyuk's friend...and it got me thinking that it might be a risk worth taking- to drop the value as much as poss (£500?) and just insure for vets fees? clearly if he breaks his leg in the field i will regret this decision...but most horses i think tend to be PTS over less immediate issues.... thinking crudely if he injures himself then i can't afford to keep another horse anyway...and if he has to be PTS then i could quite quickly save up for another horse if i wasn't having to pay to keep one? sorry, realise that probably sounds very insensitive and its really not meant to...its just a case of trying to weigh up options...any thoughts?