TarrSteps
Well-Known Member
Some of it is what people are used to looking at, too. If they have a horse that might be a little bit better than the average run of horses they see, then they figure that must mean it has potential to go much, much higher because they haven't seen really top class horses at the same age/stage so have no means for comparison. Or, possibly, they don't see the difference. 
It's really interesting to go to say, a top class auction/breeder/producer and see horses after horse with proper talent. Even then, you see a few special ones and you start to see why people pay what they do for them. Being good really isn't that unusual, being great is so unusual, you know it when you see it. (Not to say that all great horses fulfil their potential - there are too many factors in play - and that some good ones don't optimise what they have to offer, just that the vast majority of horses don't fit into either category.)
I do feel badly, though, because I think horses end up in trouble because they start out insanely priced then end up getting virtually dumped when the owner gets desperate, if their standard of care doesn't diminish in the mean time.
That said, I've seen lots of horses - and even sold a few myself - for FAR more money than I would have considered "reasonable". And many for a lot less than they would have fetched under other circumstances. Just one more thing about horses that's a gamble!
Oh, and on the breed front, often horses are worth a lot more money to do a specific job than they would be in any other sphere. I nearly fell over at the prices paid for QHs but they also have crazy prizes so I guess if you have a good one there's the chance it might actually pay for itself. But most of them presented without the all important papers would not have been worth anything like the money as riding horses or even show horses in other disciplines.
It's really interesting to go to say, a top class auction/breeder/producer and see horses after horse with proper talent. Even then, you see a few special ones and you start to see why people pay what they do for them. Being good really isn't that unusual, being great is so unusual, you know it when you see it. (Not to say that all great horses fulfil their potential - there are too many factors in play - and that some good ones don't optimise what they have to offer, just that the vast majority of horses don't fit into either category.)
I do feel badly, though, because I think horses end up in trouble because they start out insanely priced then end up getting virtually dumped when the owner gets desperate, if their standard of care doesn't diminish in the mean time.
That said, I've seen lots of horses - and even sold a few myself - for FAR more money than I would have considered "reasonable". And many for a lot less than they would have fetched under other circumstances. Just one more thing about horses that's a gamble!
Oh, and on the breed front, often horses are worth a lot more money to do a specific job than they would be in any other sphere. I nearly fell over at the prices paid for QHs but they also have crazy prizes so I guess if you have a good one there's the chance it might actually pay for itself. But most of them presented without the all important papers would not have been worth anything like the money as riding horses or even show horses in other disciplines.
Last edited: