BBP
Well-Known Member
My ponderings for today as I continue to obsess over suspensories. And it might be a really dumb question. Why is it that on some horses the lower leg is incredibly defined and you can see every tendon, ligament, everything really clearly, and on other horses the leg looks ‘softer’? Isn’t it pretty much just bone, tendon, ligament, fascia and skin below the knee/hock and there is no fat or muscle to disguise anything or fill any gaps, regardless of if you are a TB or a clydesdale?
On the less defined legs is it fluid build up, or thicker skin? Is it to do with the amount of bone relative to the tendon and ligament diameters?
The angles are different in the below photos as I was trying to catch the light on dark legs, but they show the difference in the two regardless of stance. One is much tighter looking, with very clearly defined suspensories. Even in winter coats the difference is clear to feel and see.
Just curiosity really.
On the less defined legs is it fluid build up, or thicker skin? Is it to do with the amount of bone relative to the tendon and ligament diameters?
The angles are different in the below photos as I was trying to catch the light on dark legs, but they show the difference in the two regardless of stance. One is much tighter looking, with very clearly defined suspensories. Even in winter coats the difference is clear to feel and see.
Just curiosity really.