Why we need the LACS

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
Don't know why the government ever made killing them illegal, filthy creatures and would save them the cost of TB compensation plus the forthcoming culls. I wonder how humanely those are carried out....

The article shouldn't have put 'baiting' and 'digging' in the same sentance. There is a huge difference in the two.
 

Reginald

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 November 2007
Messages
209
Visit site
Why the LACS? Well, the clue's in the name: the League is against "sports" which are clearly and deliberately cruel. This would include any activity where a creature is baited for the pleasure of the spectators: badger baiting, dog-fights, terrierwork, deer hunting etc..
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
Don't they even class horse racing as cruel, would love to see them take that on. Would most likely bankcrupt them. Mores the pity.
 

CARREG

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 July 2004
Messages
248
Visit site
Lol...."Badgers have been a protected species since 1835"...who writes this shite, gutter press at its finest, badger baiting has nothing to do with legitimate terrierwork anyway............Carreg
 

Reginald

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 November 2007
Messages
209
Visit site
Yes Carreg, terriermen are really big clever brave men because they use dogs to bait and kill foxes/badgers etc.

life get go a

a job get go
 

Eagle_day

Well-Known Member
Joined
8 December 2005
Messages
450
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
'Why the LACS? Well, the clue's in the name'

But the fact remains that LACS are not involved in campaigning against badger-baiting; if you want clarification, I suggest you talk to Douglas Batchelor or Mike Hobday.

The fact you don't know that, together with your limited rhetoric, suggests you are nothing but a troll.
 

Boudicea

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 August 2006
Messages
51
Visit site
Don't know why the government ever made killing them illegal, filthy creatures

Your sentence above explains your own quote below

'baiting' and 'digging' in the same sentance.

If you are a country person then what you have just said is ridiculous and to be quite honest pathetic.

Maybe the Badgers view you as a filthy creature who gets in their way.

Bloody pathetic human attitiude as always, "I don't like it, it shouldnt be there"

I have spent all my life in the country and I am almost twenty years older than you, the difference in being self-absorbed shows.

(Next it will be Bank voles, dirty creatures, slow worms, dirty creatures, Toad, dirty creatures, Stoats, dirty creatures, Roe deer, dirty creatures and the list goes on.......)

Just what is it may I ask that makes Badgers so dirty to you? Whilst you may be so tolerant of certain other wildlife (although I know at least one other who you would rid the country and please us all of?)

Please reply with one of your trademark sniggers or smirks if you wish.
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
"(Next it will be Bank voles, dirty creatures, slow worms, dirty creatures, Toad, dirty creatures, Stoats, dirty creatures, Roe deer, dirty creatures and the list goes on.......)"

Actually we encourage voles and toads up on our lake, why on earth would you label them dirty creatures?

Roe deer can be classed as vermin but I guess its not your winters silage stores they'd be feeding on would it. And thanks for the reminder, I think I'll get some venison out for supper.

What doesn't affect you is easy to pass by.
 

Reginald

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 November 2007
Messages
209
Visit site
I was expecting something slightly more witty than that, Severn, my juicy cumquat. Now turn off the computer and go out and get some fresh air.
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
I was expecting something slightly more witty than that, Severn, my juicy cumquat. Now turn off the computer and go out and get some fresh air.

If you're going to refer to me as a fruit atleast get the spelling right, its Kumquat, they appeared many a time on invoices so I know the correct spelling.

And leave the pups, there was me thinking you were an animal lover :eek:
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
"Cumquat" is a variant, you prawn.

Interesting. My dictionary says different..... "any of several trees or shrubs of the genus Fortunella bearing small orange-colored edible fruits with thick sweet-flavored skin and sour pulp".
 

Reginald

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 November 2007
Messages
209
Visit site
I've no problem with the definition (I'll even overlook the americanism). My simple point, Dumbo, is that one can say "kumquat" or "cumquat": they even sound the same!
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
I've no problem with the definition (I'll even overlook the americanism). My simple point, Dumbo, is that one can say "kumquat" or "cumquat": they even sound the same!

No, you're just a sad little man with 'cum' on the brain!

Funny how you are yet to reply to my question on another thread.
 

Reginald

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 November 2007
Messages
209
Visit site
Following your bizarre and juvenile "logic", what on earth should one make of your preoccupation with the "countryside"?
 

severnmiles

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
10,261
Visit site
"I'm still waiting for the(your) dictionary definition of Kumquat."

You really are bored, aren't you?

No actually, I've just had a tired sweaty horse to wash off after hunting, I think I'll settle down to te muddy tack in mo.

I'm guessing by the lack of response you know its a fruit and a fruit only.
 

Eagle_day

Well-Known Member
Joined
8 December 2005
Messages
450
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
"But the fact remains that....." zzzzzzzz

get a job "

I have a job: it pays for my hunting.

Why do you resort to abuse, rather than address the point? Are you that intellectually limited?
 
Top