ester
Not slacking multitasking
yup I can go with that!
Looking at the description it is obvious the seller isn't that knowledgeable about the Wow system, i.e. no details about seat size, type of panels, head plate, etc., all things someone wanting one of these saddles would want to know, and the ad says it'll fit around a horse around 15.2-16hh, size of horse is irrelevant for most saddles I'd have thought! However, I do think it was misleading not to say it is 8 years old on the advert initially. The seller waited to be promoted by the OP to do this. the owners health problems, however awful, are irrelevant. I've been looking at Wow's a lot recently. I've been buying and selling a few to get the right parts I need. I've bought 2006/2007 models with the resin seats for £450-£570, 2011/2012 models I've bought for £700-£800. They've all been in decent condition, not unused, but good condition. I definitely wouldn't pay more than £600 for a model of this age with a resin seat, no matter how good its condition was.
Just as the sellers health issues are irrelevant so are your musings on the price ! Like every thing on ebay its buyer beware and a contract is between a willing seller and buyer so what does it matter what you think its worth. If they want to much clearly it wont sell.
And if they are in clinical practice acting against their own code of practice ooops!I'm incredulous that a criminal.psychologist can diagnose a "pathological" mental need from one forum post and one eBay question. With instantaneous distance diagnostic abilities like that I bet they are in huge demand.
What a nasty, mean-spirited thread.
What a nasty, mean-spirited thread.
Like every thing on ebay its buyer beware and a contract is between a willing seller and buyer so what does it matter what you think its worth. If they want to much clearly it wont sell.
No, it's not buyer beware on e-bay. The item has to be appropriately described and it's the text of the ad that matters. Even if a fault is visible in a picture it must be described in the text of the ad, and the seller should certainly not assume people will ask questions, more photos or make a phone call. The rules are really clear, if an item is not as described it can be returned.
IMO the listing was misleading in part because there was no mention that the saddle was outdated (only stated that it was new with quote of the price of a new saddle so one could assume that was indeed the value of the saddle) and also because it said that the saddle is completely adjustable when apparently it is not, but probably not fraudulent as the seller did not seem very knowledgeable about saddles (saying for example if would fit a particular range of sizes of horse).
The replies from the seller/seller's partner are however overly dramatic really but it seems that she hasn't been well advised as in those cases it always seems better to just take some distance and let it go. The distress is coming from wounding oneself up over something that is not worth it, a simple mislead/exaggerated forum thread.
^^ I think ebay is quite clear on that - I buy and sell a lot on ebay, and feel they quite routinely side with the buyer when there's any kind of dispute. It's not unheard of - there have been enough reports on here - for a buyer to keep the item they have complained about AND get a refund, and for the seller to be left out of pocket. for me, *that's* why it pays to be ultra-transparent in your description. Could quite easily have gone that way in this case.Oh and on the subject of ebay you totally believe what is in the description of every article and everybody is telling the whole story( even if its an honest mistake) do you really feel the majority are that naive or maybe just you. Good luck when you try and get your money back!
Christ I don't think we really needed the full lowdown on someone's health issues just because of a saddle for sale.
there were clear inaccuracies in the posting (including price paid) and even now given the tree difference etc compared to current saddles I don't think you can say that it would cost £2600 today. I suspect that none of the inaccuracies were to to deliberately mislead but that doesn't stop them being there and I am not sure why ycmb should be expected to head into potentially lengthy discussions over ebay with someone they don't know and whom she has no juristiction over in order for them to be corrected.
I read that post out to my house guests and hilarity ensued![]()
:biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3: top marks for pulling this thread back guys!Oh QB. You must have looked so out of the loop not to have been discussing this thread... Your guests must've been so disappointed![]()
:biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3: top marks for pulling this thread back guys!
Oh QB. You must have looked so out of the loop not to have been discussing this thread... Your guests must've been so disappointed![]()
:biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3::biggrin3: top marks for pulling this thread back guys!
>>>inserts halo smiley for me<<<shhh we'll be accused of bullying or something in a minute![]()
There's no dancing naked under the full moon or anything.
There probably should be on this thread, it would fit in with all the other madness.
If P&V or Milliepops would care to join us we could be an online coven and dance naked around our laptops on the next full moon? Best leave the webcams off. TFC would be forced to slap our wrists if we put that on here!
How Festive. The next full moon is Christmas Day. Won't that be naked, daemon-raising fun!
Bit late for the solstice, but I'm not counting... It's bizarrely warm here too, but if the hell mouth opens I'll crack out my inner Buffy (lols, I do a better Giles!) and we'll get staking! Just careful of intimate splinters if we're still in the Buff, ass it were
And yes. Shils and Starzaan are essential. We may have to kidnap them.