Enfys
Well-Known Member
Oh, for flips sake.
Why do Boarders think they have the right to demand (not ask) that I move a horse to a smaller paddock, disrupting an established group to give him a companion and then get shirty when I explain that it isn't going to happen because:
a) the paddock concerned is resting and therefore not available (plus it is terrible for flies at this time of year) it is also a quarter of the size of the one he is in now.
b) that I am not moving one of my yearlings out of his group as a companion, so the yearling concerned would be alone (he'd be miserable), and
c) that I cannot see the benefit, or the need, because the horse is happy where he is, with a group.
She wants him in a smaller paddock. The horse isn't difficult to catch, in fact he comes to call, the others are not a nuisance when you go in there...I don't see the problem
Do you? Should YO's cater for the horses, or the owners whims? T'is a fine line we walk.
Owners pay me not only for the facilities, but also to look after their horses (full board not DIY) and as far as I am concerned, that is their mental as well as their physical welfare. I am not unreasonable, if the horse was being bullied, was unhappy or suffering then I'd be moving him pronto, but he isn't any of those, in fact he hasn't been happier.
Do these youngsters look unhappy to you? Would you want one of them moved to solitary splendour? They even have a lovely old Uncle who is the perfect mentor.
Why do Boarders think they have the right to demand (not ask) that I move a horse to a smaller paddock, disrupting an established group to give him a companion and then get shirty when I explain that it isn't going to happen because:
a) the paddock concerned is resting and therefore not available (plus it is terrible for flies at this time of year) it is also a quarter of the size of the one he is in now.
b) that I am not moving one of my yearlings out of his group as a companion, so the yearling concerned would be alone (he'd be miserable), and
c) that I cannot see the benefit, or the need, because the horse is happy where he is, with a group.
She wants him in a smaller paddock. The horse isn't difficult to catch, in fact he comes to call, the others are not a nuisance when you go in there...I don't see the problem
Owners pay me not only for the facilities, but also to look after their horses (full board not DIY) and as far as I am concerned, that is their mental as well as their physical welfare. I am not unreasonable, if the horse was being bullied, was unhappy or suffering then I'd be moving him pronto, but he isn't any of those, in fact he hasn't been happier.
Do these youngsters look unhappy to you? Would you want one of them moved to solitary splendour? They even have a lovely old Uncle who is the perfect mentor.
Last edited: