Recent content by fltogger

Sent the bridle back for refund yesterday which tracking shows arrived today (signed for by the owner). We've now been blocked from messaging Evo Equine on Facebook and all visitors comments asking for updates on their orders have been deleted. They've also disabled Facebook reviews. Who...

Another bad experience here. Ordered back in May, arrival time came and passed with no reply to any correspondence. Lots of other people having similar issues on their Facebook page, any comments chasing for updates or poor reviews were being deleted by Evo Equine. Eventually turned up a few...

burglars have picks for locks and bricks for glass. would you please move on from securing the images rather than persuing those actually breaking the law.. short of phoning the heads of every operating system and asking them to remove the screenshot feature from their software we (the...

see now its comments like that i like to read, hopefully this thread has served a purpose :) we spent a total of 34 hours shooting this weekend, we busted our behinds (still are busting our behinds sorting through 6-7k of photos) and had a larger initial outlay of costs than usual.. to see a...

varies hugely from teenagers up to mothers in their late 40s. suggest that to the film and music industry would you, id be interested to hear what they say to that. and as i said previously - THE PHOTOGRAPHER IS NOT THE ONE IN THE WRONG, THE PEOPLE STEALING THE IMAGES ARE. next youll...

exactly. to be honest i dont see what the problem is, we've been ASKED by the event organisers to provide a service to everyone attending.. the photos are of people competing in events not papp'd picking up a hooker.. :confused: i did (out of courtousy, not legal requirement) have a section on...

um as above, the law (or lack of it saying we cant). so the music industry should stop selling music because its too easy to copy? likewise we shouldnt have any more films made.. like i said earlier DO NOT punish the copyright owner because people are ripping us off..

legally we have the moral high ground lol lets set a few things straight.. legally nobody needs permission to photograph somebody else. legally the owner of the image can do what they like with it (as long as its not character harming etc). generally a model release can be used for commercial...

nail + head. :)

some photographers may be happy for you to do that but to assume you can do that without the say so of them would be a gross misjudgement.. has the music industry solved any of their issues with piracy though? last time i read about it they were still losing millions if not billions of pounds a...

http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/protect/p16_photography_copyright and point 8 here.. http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/copyright_myths

actually the law says you have no rights to the photo as the subject.. id suggest you read up on copyright law because you could not be more wrong.. which could end you in court in the future.

oh no you havent, at ALL times rights to the image are retained by the photographer and NEVER transferred (unless specified by the photographer).

there is no difference, both scanning the photo and saving the image off the website are breaking copyright law (unless you have permission from the photographer).

sorry but that doesnt mean a thing, purchase of a print does not transfer any copyright and you still require permission to save the image off of their site.