paddy555
Well-Known Member
This is not about the OP's post on here but I have put it here as this is where the experts seem to live
Below is a post from the PSSM forum and it is addressed to Paul Szauter.
Can anyone give me a like to the Minnesota study referred to please? on google there seem to be several but presumably this one is very recent???
hope the presentation went well.
Note that the ‘blog response’ to the Minnesota Study has not been posted on the EquiSeq website yet.
Many of us are getting concerned about the ongoing validity of testing in light of this study.
Also Generatio GmbH - Center for Animal Genetics have down graded their variant reports from “high risk” to “increased susceptibility” (which seems to be appropriate)and removed the RER link with Px adding CACNA2D3 associated myopathy.
Thank you
Below is a post from the PSSM forum and it is addressed to Paul Szauter.
Can anyone give me a like to the Minnesota study referred to please? on google there seem to be several but presumably this one is very recent???
hope the presentation went well.
Note that the ‘blog response’ to the Minnesota Study has not been posted on the EquiSeq website yet.
Many of us are getting concerned about the ongoing validity of testing in light of this study.
Also Generatio GmbH - Center for Animal Genetics have down graded their variant reports from “high risk” to “increased susceptibility” (which seems to be appropriate)and removed the RER link with Px adding CACNA2D3 associated myopathy.
Thank you