stormox
Well-Known Member
Plenty of dogs at pt-2-pts....and team chasesWell, you don't see people taking their dogs to race meetings do you? Shit does indeed happen, but preventable shit shouldn't be allowed to.
Plenty of dogs at pt-2-pts....and team chasesWell, you don't see people taking their dogs to race meetings do you? Shit does indeed happen, but preventable shit shouldn't be allowed to.
I personally think dogs should be able to cope with the occasional longer day of being left. But that and the harness wearing makes me the actual devil I think. ???
MEMBERS were asked and overwhelmingly voted to continue to allow dogs. As it’s members that compete and take the risks they obviously believe the risk to be
Edited...x posted with ester
Yes, but this was an additional risk. Anyone that didn’t want dogs would have voted against.MEMBERS were asked that question with regards to covid though, which has already been pointed out. . . .
Not at all. So now the dog is alone for 12hrs minimum and the owner is paying upward of £30 to have it looked at twice (!) in that time. More than their entry fee now, and I see that as per usual you’ve moved the goalposts. Ridiculous comment you made and you haven’t actually done anything either. Call yourself an activist?? I’ve seen more action in a snail ?? you’re clearly very young, haven’t thought your arguments through at all, because when it comes down to it, you have no foundation. Silly mare ????Now you are just being silly. If the dog needs more than 1 visit, then the owner should sort them. It’s really not a big deal.
Owners need to sort their priorities out.
Do you spend all day there, or even have overnight stays ?I volunteer at a hospice, and also at the local ISPCA kennels (walking dogs, funnily enough). I don't take my dogs with me there.
Risk of dog spreading covid and risk of dog chasing a horse aren't additional, they are entirely different and dependent on how the question is asked.Yes, but this was an additional risk. Anyone that didn’t want dogs would have voted against.
ETS: how many of you are on yards that don't allow dogs?
Troll alert, though it’s quite fun being called young .
First volunteered for eventing as assistant XC timekeeper to my late mum 50 years ago.
You are missing the point.Risk of dog spreading covid and risk of dog chasing a horse aren't additional, they are entirely different
ETS: how many of you are on yards that don't allow dogs?
To a lot of people dogs are 'family' and a family day out at an event or anywhere includes dogs. I enjoy having my dog with me when I go out..
I spend all day at both places when I go, not overnight. I have friends/relatives/neighbours who will take the dogs out during the day if necessary. Now that I am alone I have put the dogs (and cat) in kennels if I'm away for longer than a day, and have people in to care for the horses/chickens/geese, etc.Do you spend all day there, or even have overnight stays ?
Do you then pay someone to walk your dogs ?
To a lot of people dogs are 'family' and a family day out at an event or anywhere includes dogs. I enjoy having my dog with me when I go out..
Which is fine. However not everyone enjoys dogs so as long as people keep them on leads in public places away from others there are no problems. Everyone can be happy.
The only people on here acting in anyway “entitled” are those arguing that the wants of those not wanting to take dogs outweigh others who do. People have to learn to accept that we all have equal rights and therefore have to compromise.Why are the wants of people who want to tale their dogs to events, despite all the reasons not to, more important than all the genuine reasons not to?
Arguing on here is irrelevant. Although it's hardly an argument or even a discussion, it's just been entitlement with absolutely no positive points made about dogs being allowed.
No I'm not missing the point, you are extrapolating meaning from incomplete data.You are missing the point.
Someone who is in favour generally of allowing dogs might well vote in favour of a temporary ban as they might feel that the is more Covid secure.
Someone who feels that dogs should not be allowed as they are a hazard / nuisance is not going to vote to allow them on the grounds of Covid.
The only people on here acting in anyway “entitled” are those arguing that the wants of those not wanting to take dogs outweigh others who do. People have to learn to accept that we all have equal rights and therefore have to compromise.
If at somepoint in the future dogs end up banned then I will still go, but less frequently and probably only to the really local ones.
So, I’ve just walked in the door having left our accommodation at 7.15 am this morning, opened my stand at 7.45 am & left the venue at 6pm after packing down the stand, we left home at 1pm on Thursday. Our dog has been with us the whole time & has been perfectly fine because he is supervised & well trained, & on a lead or asleep in the truck, he is never taken anywhere near the course when it’s live. So, do all the haters want me to close my business & not attend events? I guess from some of the comments that that would be “tough” No, we don’t leave him, no we don’t go on holidays where we can’t take him, yes he comes to the yard with me, yes he comes into the office where I work part time in the winter, no my 90 year old dad can’t look after him for 4 days while I earn a living, no I can’t pay for kennels ... ?