LucyPriory
Well-Known Member
Ok, big fantasy bowl of sweets and chocolate for everyone to dive into at this point on me.
So long as none of it gets fed to your horses
So long as none of it gets fed to your horses
Granted, but to be fair, there are equally an awful lot of lame shod horses out there with all the said symptoms, whos owners are just as hard nosed about not going barefoot because..........
Well according to this post I must be completely incompetent and so must the nutritionist (the leading one for Saracen Horse feeds) as we cannot find anything to help my horse's feet. He's a Welsh D x TB, with TB like thin soles and hoof wall, my farrier has to shoe him with extra thickness shoes every 5 weeks due to way he wears his feet (weaving and roadwork). He is intolerant to Alfa A and most ceral based feeds as well as tending to be overweight. So he is fed a balancer, TopKoat and Hifi and this works well for him weight wise but has made no change to his feet. They are good quality just thin in structure. Now I cannot stop him weaving when he is in and he is on rubber, I dread to think what would happen if he did not have shoes on. Plus what I said about my vet saying he should not go unshod in front.
I actually think I am reasonably experienced, which is a good thing given my job but maybe I am not - I am really so cruel to shoe my horse?
I seriously question mould inhibitors and antifungals. I think they are possibly not a good thing for the very sensitive ones.
And then we slap shoes on which change the sole from being in a supporting role to being in a bridging role. Can that be a good idea?
![]()
Does this seem like a brilliant idea??? Maybe this is much better?
![]()
The more I think about it, the less sense peripheral loading makes.
IMO there are good and bad farriers. I would never let a bad farrier work on my horses' feet.
However all farriers have had much more extensive training than any EP, so I would certainly never let one of them loose on their feet. We currently have one shod all round, one shod on the front, one shoeless, all in work and one retired and shoeless. Our excellent farrier trims and shoes as necessary, decisions about what each horse has are made in conjunction with his advice.
I do wonder how it is that unregistered farriers can be found to be breaking the law by preparing horses' feet for shoeing, while 'barefoot trimmers' get away with trimming without proper qualifications.
Bruce I'm copying your diagram just because I think it is so b****y marvellous! The wonder is not that horses can work without shoes but that they are EVER sound long term in them, they work so counter to what nature intended! All that weight hanging off laminae that were never designed to do that job, and we wonder why it goes wrong from time to time!
Well according to this post I must be completely incompetent and so must the nutritionist (the leading one for Saracen Horse feeds) as we cannot find anything to help my horse's feet. He's a Welsh D x TB, with TB like thin soles and hoof wall, my farrier has to shoe him with extra thickness shoes every 5 weeks due to way he wears his feet (weaving and roadwork). He is intolerant to Alfa A and most ceral based feeds as well as tending to be overweight. So he is fed a balancer, TopKoat and Hifi and this works well for him weight wise but has made no change to his feet. They are good quality just thin in structure. Now I cannot stop him weaving when he is in and he is on rubber, I dread to think what would happen if he did not have shoes on. Plus what I said about my vet saying he should not go unshod in front.
I actually think I am reasonably experienced, which is a good thing given my job but maybe I am not - I am really so cruel to shoe my horse?
"when he is in"? When he is out is he on grass? Take him off the grass. He will then grow foot which will withstand the roadwork. No grass will probably be the answer with this horse if you wanted it barefoot. If you don't, fine, shoe it.
Now show a pic on stoney ground with stones digging into their soles and not so picture perfect
'TB like thin soles' - it's such a myth that the thoroughbred as a breed has bad feet. It's simply untrue. TB feet can be just as great as any other breed. I've seen plenty of them. TB's only have bad feet because of the way they are managed - many shod at a very young age (18 months), kept stabled, pumped full of cereals. If you take off their shoes, feed them right and condition their feet you would be amazed. You don't even need to stop racing them. Simon Earle is testament to that. The horses on his yard have beautiful feet. The thing that worries me is that for many professionals they still buy into this TB's have bad feet, end of. And that means that bad feet become acceptable for thoroughbreds - no point in trying to improve them, it's genetic. It so isn't!
But in this horse's case he is clearly cereal and alfalfa intolerant. Lucy is right in that HiFi contains alfalfa. And most balancers contain cereals - look at the small print, see if you see things like wheat feed, oat feed etc. These amounts may be small but for extra sensitive horses the smallest amounts can have huge consequences. The comments on preservatives and mold inhibitors are also very relevant. Most horses can cope with them fine but for a small minority (like a small minority of people who are wheat intolerant or dairy intolerant etc) the effects are catastrophic. I'd give Debbie at Thunderbrook horse feeds a ring and have a chat to her - all their feeds are preservative and mold inhibitor free. It's a very different way of feeding but I think would make a massive difference to this horse.[/QUOTE
iv found something I agree with
yes tb feet aren't bad and iv bought plenty with bad feet it is purely down to mostly bad diet not the breed off horse.
Re the balancers, topspec is cereal free but does contain wheat meal I think it's called. Rung them to ask because I won't feed cereal diet and it's not the high starch wheat that is used ( the inners) purely the outer husk which makes no different and can be classed as careal free.
Why would stones dig into the soles of a healthy barefoot? They certainly don't with my rock crunching barefooters.
You know what in an ideal world this is what I would do, but he goes ballistic when in. He is ok this time of year being in at night but come spring he wants out as soon as the sun comes up. Believe me we have tried everything, but he gets himself so worked up that he weaves/box walks like crazy to the point where he is foaming with sweat. This is not really humane for him at all so we manage him by maximal turnout in the spring/summer but on very poor grass with the other fatties. I work professionally with horses and if it was so simple then would have managed to get round this. Also even though the vets suggested full box rest when he injured his suspensory, when they saw the state he got into even on sedation they said it was harming him more to be in and so I got him up to the stud where I work and had him on an allweather pen. This is only something I can do outside of the breeding season so he can't live at the stud permanently.
This is the problem with the forum, if it was so black and white we would not be here but then some people clearly believe that life is very black and white. If you feel that you can deal with his issues better then fine suggest them. The vets are stumped themselves after suggesting stuff that I have already done, next step is to prescribe him Valium so he can cope with being in more.
Why are there so many bare footed horses around me with bruised soles? They can't cope with the crap ground we have in our area. The equine vets farrier is correcting 3 who have such bad bruised feet x rays have been done. I blame the owners for half this for not noticeing but I can't say on here what the vet said, I would get banned.
Iv got a tb who I would love to go bare foot so if anybody is in the south west area I'm willing to try and let you prove me wrong? Iv tried but as soon as he stands on a stone off any size he's lame as and the graval I picked deep out his soles was stupid.
He's got no slits cracks etc in his feet, all the instructors comment on how he's moves and uses himself and on a diet off topspec comprehensive balancer, hi fi un mollessed and speedi beet.
As soon as his shoes are off he can't stand and there's no way he will walk around the yard.
Honestly I'm being serious here if anybody is local I will try and see if I can change my views
'TB like thin soles' - it's such a myth that the thoroughbred as a breed has bad feet. It's simply untrue. TB feet can be just as great as any other breed. I've seen plenty of them. TB's only have bad feet because of the way they are managed - many shod at a very young age (18 months), kept stabled, pumped full of cereals. If you take off their shoes, feed them right and condition their feet you would be amazed. You don't even need to stop racing them. Simon Earle is testament to that. The horses on his yard have beautiful feet. The thing that worries me is that for many professionals they still buy into this TB's have bad feet, end of. And that means that bad feet become acceptable for thoroughbreds - no point in trying to improve them, it's genetic. It so isn't!
But in this horse's case he is clearly cereal and alfalfa intolerant. Lucy is right in that HiFi contains alfalfa. And most balancers contain cereals - look at the small print, see if you see things like wheat feed, oat feed etc. These amounts may be small but for extra sensitive horses the smallest amounts can have huge consequences. The comments on preservatives and mold inhibitors are also very relevant. Most horses can cope with them fine but for a small minority (like a small minority of people who are wheat intolerant or dairy intolerant etc) the effects are catastrophic. I'd give Debbie at Thunderbrook horse feeds a ring and have a chat to her - all their feeds are preservative and mold inhibitor free. It's a very different way of feeding but I think would make a massive difference to this horse.[/QUOTE
iv found something I agree with
yes tb feet aren't bad and iv bought plenty with bad feet it is purely down to mostly bad diet not the breed off horse.
Re the balancers, topspec is cereal free but does contain wheat meal I think it's called. Rung them to ask because I won't feed cereal diet and it's not the high starch wheat that is used ( the inners) purely the outer husk which makes no different and can be classed as careal free.
oh oh oh, wheat feed is a known baddie - and it is a cereal (derivative)
extracted from http://thunderbrook.co.uk/app/download/3106767802/Some+ingredients+of+processed+horse+feeds.pdf
Wheatfeed, Wheat Middlings
Wheatfeed is not ground up whole wheat or wheat bran. This is the major milling waste by-product of flour,
fed to horses in the UK. Wheatfeed is obtained from screened grains or dehusked spelt. It consists principally
of fragments of the outer skins and particles of the grain, course middlings and fine middlings. It is processed
(usually pelleted) to bind the fine particles together. In addition to seed treatment and ammonium nitrate
fertilisers, wheat grown in the UK receives on average 3 treatments of fungicides, 3 herbicides, 2 growth
regulators and 1 insecticide. The grain may then be dusted, sprayed or gassed with pesticides in farm grain
stores, followed by another possible dust, gas or spray of pesticides in commercial grain storage. The fabric
of the stores may also be sprayed with pesticides. Wheatfeed is primarily the outer parts of the wheat grain
that have been in direct contact with these various treatments, and contain dust, dirt, mould spores and
mycotoxins concentrated during the milling process, as for oatfeed above.
Why would stones dig into the soles of a healthy barefoot? They certainly don't with my rock crunching barefooters.
Well they bloody well do with my TB x Friesian who has excellent feet, high fibre diet with mineral supplement and low sugar, I know it's not because she's a nancy......
All my horses are on a low sugar/starch diet. All on topspec balancers in hi fi molasse free with speedi beet if needed. All have no cracks,chips nothing in their feet. Just some aren't cut out to be bare foot and can't cope with it. Anybody else seen horses muscals build up wrong while they try to go bare foot? To ease the pressure a bit and not move right?
I'm sure some horses cope really well bare foot and iv got some but for others it just won't work and for those I won't force it upon them
I think if you have a horse which can never have grass just so it can be barefoot that's a pretty grotty experience for the poor creature. If I was looking at that I'm afraid I would consider shoes the lesser of two evils. JMO of course
I don't think so.I've lost my diplomacy knack. I'll probably get infracted soon and everything!
I doubt if my rehab would describe himself as " a poor creature". He is full of the joys of life, which is just as well because if I had not taken him on his other choice was to be put to sleep. Do you REALLY think a horse would rather be dead than live life on a dry lot with hay to eat?
Shoes were not an option, he had navicular disease too.
I don't think so.What does infracted mean please?
![]()
I had a TB with incredibly flat feet. They were like soup plates. I don't think he would ever have stayed sound without shoes. He was constantly picking up bruises and abscesses as it was.
I think if you have a horse which can never have grass just so it can be barefoot that's a pretty grotty experience for the poor creature. If I was looking at that I'm afraid I would consider shoes the lesser of two evils. JMO of course
I had a TB with incredibly flat feet. They were like soup plates. I don't think he would ever have stayed sound without shoes. He was constantly picking up bruises and abscesses as it was.
I think if you have a horse which can never have grass just so it can be barefoot that's a pretty grotty experience for the poor creature. If I was looking at that I'm afraid I would consider shoes the lesser of two evils. JMO of course
So the horse can't feel it's feet, so we think 'fantastic' but it still has a problem in its gut, we just don't necessarily notice, doesn't mean its not there. Is that ok?