Booboos
Well-Known Member
And just because I am a wee bit OCD and you nice people may wish to indulge me!
http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=434511
http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=434511
how many of you have had a horse randomley trip to the point of firing you in to the fence please, whilst on the flat,not jumping?(an otherwise well behaved horse not one looping the loop)
Going back to the Courtney King-Dye accident, does anyone actually know exactly what happened? Was it definitely on concrete? The press reports seem to mostly say that she was trying a horse for a client, asked it to move its haunches over and that it got its legs tangled and fell, which makes it sound like it was in a school. I must say I have seen a similar accident where a very placid, reliable horse was doing lateral work, got his legs tangled and fell, though fortunately the rider didn't hit his head and was wearing a hat anyway.
Nevertheless, I understand PS's point of view. She is arguing (correct me if I am mistaken, PS!) that outside of freak accidents, there is no statistical evidence showing any significant danger to an experienced rider schooling a sensible, well-schooled horse on a surface. Yes, freak accidents can happen to anyone, such as CKD. However, freak accidents can also happen on the ground, and just as many people on here can cite knowledge of equestrian freak accidents, I bet most of us can cite such accidents occurring during otherwise perfectly harmless activities. I think what PS is saying is that she doesn't know of any evidence that suggests that not wearing a helmet in very specific circumstances is more inherently risky than walking down the street or going to a pub. As far as I know, none of the links provided show any analysis of the types of situations where the head injuries were sustained. I'd also be very interested in finding out if anyone has shown there to be a higher rate of head injury among a population of non-hatted dressage riders to a comparable group of hatted dressage riders.
It strikes me that, aside from very rare cases of people with hat related head problems, for most of us the cost of wearing a hat is fairly negligeable.
Just the thought of my Mother/OH/Whoever having to wipe my backside and change my tampons is reason enough to wear a hat.
how many of you have had a horse randomley trip to the point of firing you in to the fence please, whilst on the flat,not jumping?(an otherwise well behaved horse not one looping the loop)
I think this is a key point. The head is such a vulnerable area of the body, damage to it can have catastrophic results, and yet it is pretty simple to give it protection by wearing a hat which doesn't take two seconds to put on, and doesn't restrict you or impact on your riding in any way. The only drawback to wearing a hat seems to be the dreaded 'hat hair' but personally I won't let vanity stop me wearing one!
Just keep in mind helmets do not make one invincible. They don't help from a broken neck, for example. And neither does not wearing a helmet sign your death warrant every time you get on. Sure, it lessens the chance of some head injuries. CKD could still have had a TBI with a helmet, because of the whiplash. Would it have been less with a helmet? Maybe.
OMG, i'd thought about having to have my bum wiped, that'd be awful beyond words, but jeezus, that's last bit just utterly horrified me. ugh. yeuk.
Absolutely to the first point. Actually, the last time I schooled without a hat (yonks ago, boiling hot day, very trustworthy homebred) I noticed that I was slightly more passive in my attitude, I do wonder whether knowing that one is more vulnerable makes one ask things slightly more passively... whether having a hat on does encourage the 'i'm invincible, i can push/ask this horse for more and more' attitude. i really don't know.
CKD fractured her skull. surely it's safe to say that a helmeted head is protected from such injuries far more than an unhelmeted head...? i don't think "Maybe" gets in there, really...![]()
![]()
Well a larger person may be larger through illness/injury/medication.certainly more horses dropping for no reason than i thought, that i will admit.
its not so much the fact that people dont like it/dont agree with it etc, its the way in which people put their view across. i can agree to disagree but take exception to the name calling.
anyone who smokes, drink, sunbathes or is overweight through overeating,is taking as much of a calculated risk, if not more,and is putting as much of an alleged strain on the NHS.i can only imagine how well calling a larger person stupid would go down!
ill ask again -where does it end? law to wear hats whilst clipping?loading?turning out?bringing in?grooming? have seen/heard about far more accidents/injuries caused by the first two than by hatless flatowork, and i refuse to believe that every single person on this thread wears a hat for clipping and loading!
I was referring more to the comment about calling a larger person "stupid". I wasn't twisting.:masiveamountofswearwords: i said "overweight through OVEREATING!!!!! stop twisting things!
do you wear a hat for clipping then?
Someone stopped me on the road once and asked me why I wasn't wearing a hat, it turned out he was an ex showjumper (now a lorry driver) who had come off a very safe horse in a freak accident and he wasn't wearing a hat. He had very serious head injuries and was in a coma for 3 weeks. He had to learn to do everything all over again and in the meantime lost his yard and horses, and had to give up showjumping.