Batgirl
Well-Known Member
I've done a lot of writing over the years for judges from list 6 to two, and one thing I've found is that new judges tend to be harsher than some higher up the list. I thought it would be the other way round, but I think sometimes new judges are filled with evangelical fervour and like to be very judgemental and judge from the bottom mark up, whereas the higher list judges tend to see where the rider/horse has lost marks and judge from 10 down, if that makes sense.
This is a generalisation, and I've never written for higher than medium tests, but this is how it appears to me.
I would agree with this in some respects -it is a confidence thing - are they (whatever the list) confident enought to give the marks a movement deserves (either good or bad). Often it is the newer ones who have less confidence to give the good marks and can come out harsher.
OP Clicking should be obviously penalised on yuor sheet - you shoud get an error -2 (it was just an example of how it is not so black and white to have higher marks in teh test than for the rider mark)