Echo Bravo
Well-Known Member
I'm begining to love Ladydragon.


Who was Skewby? I asked this before but nobody replied!![]()
Bullying? Pah! I feel ostracised!!
Why arent I in a clique??![]()
You're in the "rodents as avator" clique.![]()
I don't see how naming the "bullies" will help (not that I feel there are any) it will just esculate into arguement. One of my main gripes is when people correct anothers spelling. I feel it is totally uncalled for and rude. For all they know the poster could be dyslexic. I cannot name names however as I don't always find its the same people who do it. I do feel there is a "in crowd" however I don't feel they bully or try to be nasty. But the "in jokes" do get boring after a while. But I just ignore them threads. Simples![]()
My point was, I also have a rodent avator. Do keep up, please.That will be just me then....by myself......on my own......again!.....*sniff!*
There are of course a few posters who only seem to appear on the forum to stir things up, cause trouble and snipe at people. They usually get banned when they take it a little too far. But they come back, under new names, and I do think at least one of them's here on this thread....
Then there's another who clearly invented a second identity whose role was to come in and back themselves up when "losing" an arguement. That was really fun to watch.![]()
Fii you can be in a clique with me if you like![]()
There's one who springs to mind who often delivers harsh, barbed comments which all the same sometimes make me shout with laughter.Telling an anxious Mum to get her child ballet lessons instead, for example.
the same poster seems to me to be very knowledgable and often gives sound, sensible advice though.
Then there's another who clearly invented a second identity whose role was to come in and back themselves up when "losing" an arguement. That was really fun to watch.![]()
My point was, I also have a rodent avator. Do keep up, please.
Actually, looking back, at least two of these re-incarnations appear to be here.
I quite enjoy some of the "characters" on this forum. I don't think it's fair to name them, these are only my (possibly quite wrong) opinions/assessments and I don't want to embarrass anyone.
There's one who springs to mind who often delivers harsh, barbed comments which all the same sometimes make me shout with laughter.Telling an anxious Mum to get her child ballet lessons instead, for example.
the same poster seems to me to be very knowledgable and often gives sound, sensible advice though.
Then there's another who clearly invented a second identity whose role was to come in and back themselves up when "losing" an arguement. That was really fun to watch.![]()
I feel like a complete dunce. I've missed all the subtle nuances and people being banned and new identities and notorious bullies. In real life I am quite perceptive. On here I think I turn into an 8 y o pony lover and just like seeing photos of new forests and highlands and hearing about other people's Arabs!
My point was, I also have a rodent avator. Do keep up, please.
![]()
Or, you may just have a life.
Some of us really need to get out more.![]()
Then there's another who clearly invented a second identity whose role was to come in and back themselves up when "losing" an arguement. That was really fun to watch.![]()
I am about to attempt to read this thread, it is rather long so may take a while.... please nobody get it pulled before I reach the end![]()
What a strange thing to claim, so that person couldn't have had a friend or even family member fairly recently join the forum then? Certainly that's happened to me, I know few people on here but recently a couple of people local to me have either joined the forum at my say so or made themselves known to me on here...and have had similar views on subjects..![]()
Do they share a distinctive and eccentric syntax with you though?![]()
And always log off the moment you log on, and vice versa?!![]()
We also had the strange case of the person who came in to slag someone off (a dealer, I think). Then they invented a second ID to defend the slagee and the two argued.It seemed most likely "both" were in fact the person being discussed. Most odd.