JFTDWS
Well-Known Member
…
Last edited:
I'm obviously confusing a lot of people today, but my comment was in response to those people upthread who have said they canter towards people who are on foot.As I said it's difficult to judge with a camera but it doesn't actually look like the rider is galloping towards but past wth quite a lot of space on each side.
Maybe the dog owners can use the same psychic powers I'm expected to use when a strange dog runs at me.
I am not sure what Rowreach means by cantering towards people
35mph? Should’ve been at Cheltenham!Technically yes, legally not so sure - and the horse - travelling at circa 35mph? - would’ve appeared before the dog owner remembered where its lead was
I was just a little cautious as a wider angle lens could make them look further away than a longer lens. The type of lenses used for hatcams are more likely to be wider for more coverage but can't be sure.While I agree that video angle is hard to read the rider is going past not towards the people it does not look very close
I agree with you, as some beaches which are shared horses and humans, it's hard to canter or gallop along with people sharing it, just like going across an open park area. When the dog was spotted though she could have swerved the horse round to the right before she got too close.While I agree that video angle is hard to read the rider is going past not towards the people it does not look very close
I am not sure what Rowreach means by cantering towards people I don’t see the video showing towards past yes but she not galloping at anyone .
Her lack of reaction to the dog was foolish and wrong .
Well maybe they should stick to the footpaths, as I said 95% of the tracks are footpath with only 3 horse rider tracks, the tracks in the woods are twisty and they are horse tracks paid for and maintained by horse riders. If that would be the case then horse riders would have to walk everywhere around here as there is no straight paths. We have very few places to hack around here. They won't allow us on the footpaths which is understandable, but it is a major horse area, and we maintain the paths and trims them and pay for the surface and signs. Respect goes both ways. Not safe for people to take prams and buggies on the horse tracks for all concerned.If someone came round a corner so fast I had to 'jump to the side out of the way', I'd certainly be shouting at them.
If you can't see clear ahead, slow up and then go again if it's clear.
I'm not sure what you mean by horse track - are they bridlepaths? Are they actually walking on tracks they don't have permission/right to access or is it just that it annoys you when they do?Well maybe they should stick to the footpaths, as I said 95% of the tracks are footpath with only 3 horse rider tracks, the tracks in the woods are twisty and they are horse tracks paid for and maintained by horse riders. If that would be the case then horse riders would have to walk everywhere around here as there is no straight paths. We have very few places to hack around here. They won't allow us on the footpaths which is understandable, but it is a major horse area, and we maintain the paths and trims them and pay for the surface and signs. Respect goes both ways. Not safe for people to take prams and buggies on the horse tracks for all concerned.
Also what if another horse rider was on the track walking and you were cantering?I'm not sure what you mean by horse track - are they bridlepaths? Are they actually walking on tracks they don't have permission/right to access or is it just that it annoys you when they do?
It's almost like being able to see what's ahead of you is just generally a good idea?Also what if another horse rider was on the track walking and you were cantering?