Griffin
Well-Known Member
Aforementioned lab x cocker. Unfortunately looking fatter than usual and also tail-less. ?View attachment 67643
Look at him though, such a lovely boy!
Aforementioned lab x cocker. Unfortunately looking fatter than usual and also tail-less. ?View attachment 67643
good luck with finding that cross, i had a whippet/border collie and she was fantastic, looked like a whippet but easy to train like a collie(photo) ...my next one was whippet/bearded collie/bedlington and was very different, a really high prey drive and quite difficult to get her attention for training as she didnt do treats or toys or balls.. now have a border collie/lab and 2 terrier mixes, all mongrels....the only pedigree i ever had was a deerhound which was my dream dogView attachment 67618
I will openly admit to being a bitof a purebred snob but I do like the idea of a nice sprocker for the next sport dog.
Some years back I met a couple with 2 large, hairy good looking dogs. They put me in mind of my Rottie/GSD so I asked what cross they were. "Actually they're Leonbergers" was the rather chilly reply.
First was Rottie/GSD (long haired) a stunning dog who was abandoned at the kennels where I worked
I'm wondering what breeds people think might be helped by crossing out, for example I love KCCs but wouldn't dare get one due to their health problems and not knowing enough to make the right choice, would these breed be improved by crossing with other spaniels or something else or just being more selective in which ones get bred? There seems to be a fondness for spaniel x lab but if you get the best of both what benefit is there over one or the other, and if you get the worst how bad is that?
The best mixes I have seen consistently are lab x springer and lab x collie
I've got a Kelpie Collie cross and he's ace. He's a complicated, complex, sensitive, independent, intelligent, good looking dog. Wouldn't be without him.
I think crossbreeding within groups or types of dogs should actually be encouraged personally. So generic spaniels, collies, retrievers, shepherd dogs, hounds, spitzes, little floofs, terrorists etc etc.
I think problems crop up when you cross two very different breeds. But problems also result from the close breeding necessary to keep every single breed "pure".
I'm more of a lumper than a splitter basically.
From your pool of crossed within type dog you could have them assessed for breed, so you get a 'collie of border collie type' if you want. You could still have conformation showing but the focus would be more on soundness and temperament and general conformation than on how much it looks like just one thing. More like horse showing in a way.
There. My controversial vision for dog breeding. Jazz hands.
The best mixes I have seen consistently are lab x springer and lab x collie
We get a lot of those out shooting. Neighbouring keeper has 3/4 lab and 1/4 springers, he says the spaniel just revs the lab up a bit. They all look different though.
Tried to attach a picture but it says it's too big for the server or somethingNeed a photo! I had a kelpie x heeler, she was a nightmare tbh but I loved her to bits.
Tried to attach a picture but it says it's too big for the server or something
I think anything brachy would benefit from outcrossing. I cannot believe people breed (or buy!) a dog that isn’t fit for function and can’t breathe. I saw a jogger out with his pug the other day, poor little thing was heaving.
Tried to attach a picture but it says it's too big for the server or something
We have a 15 yr old Splab (Springer x Lab) and she's an awesome mix. Born before the crazy crosses were a thing, so she cost us £70 as an accidental mongrel. I like to refer to her as a 'love child'.
I think anything brachy would benefit from outcrossing. I cannot believe people breed (or buy!) a dog that isn’t fit for function and can’t breathe. I saw a jogger out with his pug the other day, poor little thing was heaving.