Meowy Catkin
Meow!
Can anyone explain why a Rambo would have thinner webbing for its surcingles than a 600d Amigo? It seems odd to have lower quality fittings on their supposedly 'top range' rugs. I can only guess that logic doesn't come into it.
Designed by an idiot ? It’s the only conclusion I can come to
The polyester webbing used in surcingles has a tremendous breaking strain, I have hundreds of metres of it in varying widths in my saddlery workshop.
Even the thinnest I have will have a breaking strain of 3000kgs (3.30 tons) I also have webbing up to 7500kgs (7.71 tons) that's the standard 50mm width used for surcingles I am talking about.
If you have something that's SO strong it can't ever break then it could be too dangerous to use. The worst it will do is fray as it's woven, which if nipped in the bud by the owner can be easily stopped. The thickest webbing will also fray so no better off in that respect.
It's easier to use and sew on surcingle fittings to the thinner stuff, I would never be able to get the 7500kgs stuff round or through the fittings!
I have been in the warehouse that supplies me, amazing place, 300 tons of webbing at any one time and they have a machine to test the breaking strain, I have seen it working it takes ALOT to break it. One webbing was capable of taking 50 tons and when that breaks all hell is let loose, so loud!
I would not worry about the webbing or how thin it is, concentrate on looking for fraying, that's the main way , but not only, this stuff breaks
Oz-up to his eyeballs in webbing
I have that rug and I know what you mean about the thinner webbing, but it seems to do the job.
My bugbear is rugs that only have one trigger clip on the tail surcingle which makes it fiddly for quick removal when washing.