Hunt Sab ran over

Barton Bounty

Just simply loving life with Orbi 🥰
Joined
19 November 2018
Messages
17,221
Location
Sconnie Botland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Visit site
And that is your right, as it’s the right of people to protest. Protest doesn’t need to be violent. Most people tend to be live and let live.

But clearly you are a judgemental person. But of course - most of us are. Which is why so many stand up for what they believe in ?
Yep , and I agree with you @Amymay but I certainly dont got around picking out everyones comments that I dont agree with.. unlike some on here ?
 

Clodagh

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2005
Messages
26,652
Location
Devon
Visit site
Surely it’s completely irrelevant that the victim was a hunt sab or anything else? I can see that if someone broke in to my house I would, if I was brave enough, hit them with something but it would take a lot for me to run someone down in relatively cold blood.
At the end of the day someone lost their temper and deliberately ploughed into someone else.
 

Sandstone1

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 July 2010
Messages
8,179
Visit site
There’s a lot of assumptions on this thread. Was the victim a sab or a monitor? Did they hurt any animal at any time before the incident? Do we actually know why they were there?

Also, none of that actually matters, neither is “well sabs do xyz.” relevant. That doesn’t matter in this case. Did
Harrassment is illegal though ? so if someone is doing something within the law why should someone be trespassing and harassing them? Just curious based on your above post ?
Same hunt, Within the law? I do not think so. Clearly hunting a fox..... Whats the excuse for that? Huntsman clearly hunting hounds on after a fox. Trail hunting my a***!
 
Last edited:

Roasted Chestnuts

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 July 2008
Messages
8,158
Location
Scotland
Visit site

twiggy2

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 July 2013
Messages
11,708
Location
Highlands from Essex
Visit site
Really? Cause all I have said in my statement is stick to what concerns you? ?? instead of everyone going at each other
So women would not be able to vote, people of colour would still be slaves as would children and women in many countries and women would still be owned and regularly raped by their husbands and it would all be legal all over the word. I do call that a good thing.
 

Fellewell

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 June 2010
Messages
841
Visit site
one of the things I don’t like about the hunting protestors is that they pretend to be animal lovers but are happy to harm either the horses or the hounds , once they did that they lost any credibility as far as I am concerned. I wouldn’t go as far as driving at someone but if anyone hurt any of my animals I would retaliate….i didnt hunt but if I was on a drag hunt or a fun ride i don’t see why someone has the right To harass me…. Agree some hunts are acting illegally but it is not the fault of the animals, they are just easy targets

Hunts are legally entitled to trail hunt. Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet. The woman clipped by the car did not require hospital treatment thankfully and was immediately released. The driver is under investigation and any link to the hunt has yet to be proven. Sabs have never held the moral high ground in these instances and comparing their terrorism to women's rights is in particularly poor taste, especially given what is happening in Iran right now.
 

Sandstone1

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 July 2010
Messages
8,179
Visit site
Was this video taken that day? If not you are missing the point, the known fact is the woman was struck by a car.
The video was taken last Saturday or so it says, I am not missing the point at all. Fact a woman was knocked down by a hunt supporter. Fact the same hunt is illegally hunting foxes. Even if not the same day it proves that hunt does illegally hunt which would be why sabs were out protesting.
 

Sandstone1

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 July 2010
Messages
8,179
Visit site
Hunts are legally entitled to trail hunt. Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet. The woman clipped by the car did not require hospital treatment thankfully and was immediately released. The driver is under investigation and any link to the hunt has yet to be proven. Sabs have never held the moral high ground in these instances and comparing their terrorism to women's rights is in particularly poor taste, especially given what is happening in Iran right now.
I would say she was more than clipped by the car and it was a deliberate act. If that happened to someone walking down the street it would be attempted murder. The hunt is not trail hunting in that video is it? Unless the fox is laying the trail!
 

NinjaPony

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 March 2011
Messages
3,102
Visit site
Wow this is really exposing how people justify violence based on their own prejudices. And goes a long way to showing how basic rights can be stripped away because you don’t like them applying to everyone, even groups you fundamentally disagree with. There is absolutely no justification for hitting a person with a car deliberately like that. I find the ‘they had it coming’ arguments incredibly disturbing.
 

Dexter

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 October 2009
Messages
1,607
Visit site
I would say she was more than clipped by the car and it was a deliberate act. If that happened to someone walking down the street it would be attempted murder. The hunt is not trail hunting in that video is it? Unless the fox is laying the trail!

I guess if she wasnt injured in anyway then it couldnt have been as bad as it looked, so unlikely to be attempted murder.
 

Cherryblossom

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
490
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
As someone who sits on the fence when it comes to hunting, I find the degree of whataboutery profoundly depressing. Pro and Anti people are not ever going to change their minds, but seeing that woman being mowed down called ‘clipped with a car’ and all the counter arguments about trespass does nothing to persuade me that hunting should be supported.
If all the pro-hunt people roundly condemned this behaviour without throwing in a toddler like ‘but they did….’ then I’d be much more inclined to believe that this behaviour was a radical fringe element, that than something that many people secretly (or not so secretly) think was justified. And the pros are completely shooting themselves in the foot with that behaviour, because you’ll just push people like me to become anti hunting. We will end up losing a big part of our horsey culture and history because the majority of decent pro hunting people can’t drown out the voices of these despicable hard-line law- breaking amoral nut jobs.
 

sakura

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 August 2008
Messages
917
Visit site
Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet.

Did the victim send death threats to the landowner? If they did (and there is zero evidence), is hitting a human with a car and fleeing the scene a justifiable response?

If your answer is no, then your post is, respectfully, irrelevant to the case being discussed.

As for comparing the behaviour of sabs to the fight for women’s rights, no one has done that. The right to protest was compared, and everyone has the right to protest, including those who are against hunting.
 

Dexter

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 October 2009
Messages
1,607
Visit site
She was injured and taken to hospital. Its only luck she was not killed. The attitude on here from some people is a disgrace.

Someone just posted that she wasnt injured, I guess at this point there's no way of knowing what happened and whats happening now, but I'd imagine in time it will come out, at least if the driver is charged or not.
 

scats

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 September 2007
Messages
11,315
Location
Wherever it is I’ll be limping
Visit site
Hunts are legally entitled to trail hunt. Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet. The woman clipped by the car did not require hospital treatment thankfully and was immediately released. The driver is under investigation and any link to the hunt has yet to be proven. Sabs have never held the moral high ground in these instances and comparing their terrorism to women's rights is in particularly poor taste, especially given what is happening in Iran right now.

You certainly have a different meaning of ‘clipped by the car’ than I do!
 

Rowreach

Adjusting my sails
Joined
13 May 2007
Messages
17,856
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
Did the victim send death threats to the landowner? If they did (and there is zero evidence), is hitting a human with a car and fleeing the scene a justifiable response?

If your answer is no, then your post is, respectfully, irrelevant to the case being discussed.

.

It seems that the landowner/host has received death threats following the incident.
 

Fred66

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 February 2017
Messages
3,066
Visit site
As someone who sits on the fence when it comes to hunting, I find the degree of whataboutery profoundly depressing. Pro and Anti people are not ever going to change their minds, but seeing that woman being mowed down called ‘clipped with a car’ and all the counter arguments about trespass does nothing to persuade me that hunting should be supported.
If all the pro-hunt people roundly condemned this behaviour without throwing in a toddler like ‘but they did….’ then I’d be much more inclined to believe that this behaviour was a radical fringe element, that than something that many people secretly (or not so secretly) think was justified. And the pros are completely shooting themselves in the foot with that behaviour, because you’ll just push people like me to become anti hunting. We will end up losing a big part of our horsey culture and history because the majority of decent pro hunting people can’t drown out the voices of these despicable hard-line law- breaking amoral nut jobs.
If you read the other thread in tack room on this you will find all of us that hunt regularly have totally condemned the actions of the driver, if she deliberately drove at that person there is no excuse , if she left the scene of the accident without stopping then there are very few reasons as to why this might be acceptable and is more likely that it is unacceptable.
There is some dispute as to whether the driver was actually associated with the hunt.
Be in no doubt most people whichever side of the fence they are should condemn the actions of anyone that has deliberately set out to injure and potentially kill another person.
I can understand that the harassment sustained by some can make them less tolerant and more inclined to be unsympathetic when people are injured when deliberately putting themselves in harms way and argue mitigating factors, but this woman was hit from behind in what seems to be a deliberate act and there can be no excuse.
 

sakura

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 August 2008
Messages
917
Visit site
It seems that the landowner/host has received death threats following the incident.

But was it the victim sending them? If not, it has nothing to do with them. If so (and there is no evidence of that), it still doesn’t justify the crime.

Again, there is no evidence that the victim committed any crime in connection with what then happened to them.

It’s sad that this thread is anything other than sending well wishes to the victim and condemnation of the driver. Let’s be clear, hunt monitors have a right to observe hunts. No one has the right to hit someone with their car and flee the scene.
 

Rowreach

Adjusting my sails
Joined
13 May 2007
Messages
17,856
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
But was it the victim sending them? If not, it has nothing to do with them. If so (and there is no evidence of that), it still doesn’t justify the crime.

Again, there is no evidence that the victim committed any crime in connection with what then happened to them.

It’s sad that this thread is anything other than sending well wishes to the victim and condemnation of the driver. Let’s be clear, hunt monitors have a right to observe hunts. No one has the right to hit someone with their car and flee the scene.

I’ve made no assumptions because I don’t know. I was merely clarifying for you that the landowner had indeed received death threats, after the incident.

Please don’t attribute opinions to me.
 

Roasted Chestnuts

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 July 2008
Messages
8,158
Location
Scotland
Visit site
I would say she was more than clipped by the car and it was a deliberate act. If that happened to someone walking down the street it would be attempted murder. The hunt is not trail hunting in that video is it? Unless the fox is laying the trail!

I can tell you for a fact that it isn’t an automatic charge of attempted murder. That is not what the man who deliberately mounted the pavement to get me was charged with even though it was downgraded to lesser. So I think you need to get your facts correct.

Having been through this all first hand I have complete sympathy with the person hit by the car, however I have no patience for some of the speculation and making up of ‘facts’ that is going on in this thread by some.

Also car insurance is voided when you deliberately drive your car at someone so for the victims sake it would be better if this was out down as accidental as it’s a less arduous road to go down to get proper compensation for your injuries.
 
Last edited:

Tiddlypom

Carries on creakily
Joined
17 July 2013
Messages
23,897
Location
In between the Midlands and the North
Visit site
Well, no matter how reprehensible the incident was, death threats to anyone are of course utterly wrong and abhorrent. I hope that it is possible to trace the culprits and that they are dealt by the authorities.

I don't know the identity of the woman who ran the sab down, but there is a clear still on line of her face taken from the video footage. That, along with her age (in the police report), the fact that she is local (from police) and was driving a car with a distinctive personalised numberplate ought to make her relatively easy for locals to identify.
 
Top