Fjord
Well-Known Member
Bl00dy hell, people may not like a hunt sab disrupting proceedings, but deliberately knocking them over with a car is a bit harsh! The original video was shocking to watch.
Yep , and I agree with you @Amymay but I certainly dont got around picking out everyones comments that I dont agree with.. unlike some on here ?And that is your right, as it’s the right of people to protest. Protest doesn’t need to be violent. Most people tend to be live and let live.
But clearly you are a judgemental person. But of course - most of us are. Which is why so many stand up for what they believe in ?
No, I think it's because s/he thinks your opinion really sucks.Why, cause i am allowed my own opinion and i dont agree with you? Boohoo ??
And apparently your not allowed your own opinion ???how dare INo, I think it's because s/he thinks your opinion really sucks.
No, you're welcome to your opinion. But you will also have to accept that a lot of us think it's a pretty rubbish way to look at things and are happy to tell you so.And apparently your not allowed your own opinion ???how dare I
There’s a lot of assumptions on this thread. Was the victim a sab or a monitor? Did they hurt any animal at any time before the incident? Do we actually know why they were there?
Also, none of that actually matters, neither is “well sabs do xyz.” relevant. That doesn’t matter in this case. Did
Same hunt, Within the law? I do not think so. Clearly hunting a fox..... Whats the excuse for that? Huntsman clearly hunting hounds on after a fox. Trail hunting my a***!Harrassment is illegal though ? so if someone is doing something within the law why should someone be trespassing and harassing them? Just curious based on your above post ?
Same hunt, Within the law? I do not think so. Clearly hunting a fox..... Whats the excuse for that? Huntsman clearly hunting hounds on after a fox. Trail hunting my a***!
So women would not be able to vote, people of colour would still be slaves as would children and women in many countries and women would still be owned and regularly raped by their husbands and it would all be legal all over the word. I do call that a good thing.Really? Cause all I have said in my statement is stick to what concerns you? ?? instead of everyone going at each other
Congratulations, you’re the first person I have ever hidden on this forum.
It will make the forum a much nicer place now you've done that
one of the things I don’t like about the hunting protestors is that they pretend to be animal lovers but are happy to harm either the horses or the hounds , once they did that they lost any credibility as far as I am concerned. I wouldn’t go as far as driving at someone but if anyone hurt any of my animals I would retaliate….i didnt hunt but if I was on a drag hunt or a fun ride i don’t see why someone has the right To harass me…. Agree some hunts are acting illegally but it is not the fault of the animals, they are just easy targets
The video was taken last Saturday or so it says, I am not missing the point at all. Fact a woman was knocked down by a hunt supporter. Fact the same hunt is illegally hunting foxes. Even if not the same day it proves that hunt does illegally hunt which would be why sabs were out protesting.Was this video taken that day? If not you are missing the point, the known fact is the woman was struck by a car.
I would say she was more than clipped by the car and it was a deliberate act. If that happened to someone walking down the street it would be attempted murder. The hunt is not trail hunting in that video is it? Unless the fox is laying the trail!Hunts are legally entitled to trail hunt. Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet. The woman clipped by the car did not require hospital treatment thankfully and was immediately released. The driver is under investigation and any link to the hunt has yet to be proven. Sabs have never held the moral high ground in these instances and comparing their terrorism to women's rights is in particularly poor taste, especially given what is happening in Iran right now.
I would say she was more than clipped by the car and it was a deliberate act. If that happened to someone walking down the street it would be attempted murder. The hunt is not trail hunting in that video is it? Unless the fox is laying the trail!
She was injured and taken to hospital. Its only luck she was not killed. The attitude on here from some people is a disgrace.I guess if she wasnt injured in anyway then it couldnt have been as bad as it looked, so unlikely to be attempted murder.
Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet.
She was injured and taken to hospital. Its only luck she was not killed. The attitude on here from some people is a disgrace.
Hunts are legally entitled to trail hunt. Sabs are not entitled to send death threats to landowners who host a meet. The woman clipped by the car did not require hospital treatment thankfully and was immediately released. The driver is under investigation and any link to the hunt has yet to be proven. Sabs have never held the moral high ground in these instances and comparing their terrorism to women's rights is in particularly poor taste, especially given what is happening in Iran right now.
Did the victim send death threats to the landowner? If they did (and there is zero evidence), is hitting a human with a car and fleeing the scene a justifiable response?
If your answer is no, then your post is, respectfully, irrelevant to the case being discussed.
.
If you read the other thread in tack room on this you will find all of us that hunt regularly have totally condemned the actions of the driver, if she deliberately drove at that person there is no excuse , if she left the scene of the accident without stopping then there are very few reasons as to why this might be acceptable and is more likely that it is unacceptable.As someone who sits on the fence when it comes to hunting, I find the degree of whataboutery profoundly depressing. Pro and Anti people are not ever going to change their minds, but seeing that woman being mowed down called ‘clipped with a car’ and all the counter arguments about trespass does nothing to persuade me that hunting should be supported.
If all the pro-hunt people roundly condemned this behaviour without throwing in a toddler like ‘but they did….’ then I’d be much more inclined to believe that this behaviour was a radical fringe element, that than something that many people secretly (or not so secretly) think was justified. And the pros are completely shooting themselves in the foot with that behaviour, because you’ll just push people like me to become anti hunting. We will end up losing a big part of our horsey culture and history because the majority of decent pro hunting people can’t drown out the voices of these despicable hard-line law- breaking amoral nut jobs.
It seems that the landowner/host has received death threats following the incident.
But was it the victim sending them? If not, it has nothing to do with them. If so (and there is no evidence of that), it still doesn’t justify the crime.
Again, there is no evidence that the victim committed any crime in connection with what then happened to them.
It’s sad that this thread is anything other than sending well wishes to the victim and condemnation of the driver. Let’s be clear, hunt monitors have a right to observe hunts. No one has the right to hit someone with their car and flee the scene.
I would say she was more than clipped by the car and it was a deliberate act. If that happened to someone walking down the street it would be attempted murder. The hunt is not trail hunting in that video is it? Unless the fox is laying the trail!