Hunting is in a spot of bother

palo1

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 July 2012
Messages
6,839
Visit site
I think a lot of the resentment towards the ban was because it seemed so political; there was Tony Blair's unpopularity over the Gulf war and it was seen as his 'get out of jail free' card with his left wingers; old scores to be settled ('Thatcher closed the pits, now it's the toffs' turn') and the alleged huge donation to the Labour Party from PETA
If it had been seen purely as an animal welfare thing welfare issue the reaction might have been very different
I'm very anti 'real' hunting now but got sucked into the hype; I'm embarrassed to admit that I even signed Roger Scruton's stupid Hunting Declaration

I never signed the Declaration but I don't think it was entirely stupid as a statement of position. It was just a community trying to communicate their strength of feeling I guess.
 

SantaVera

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 November 2020
Messages
2,640
Visit site
They just like killing things. Pure and simple. Also some of them are not good enough riders for drag hunting as its faster and has less stopping and starting and hanging around than fox hunting.
I agree with this statement I've been drag hunting, it's fast and fun, when I mentioned this to some fox hunting people the reaction was that that is far too much for them.
 

Fellewell

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 June 2010
Messages
841
Visit site
I wasn’t aware that clean boot only referred to bloodhounds, and ycbm politely pointed me to the correct definition without being rude like you! I do however know that trail hunting use a fox scent, I also know about dogs scenting as i participate in dog Scentwork and man trailing. A dog can not detect the difference between an artificial fox scent and a natural fox scent, unless that artificial fox scent doesn’t actually smell like fox. That is not at all the same thing as a visual dummy and a pheasant



Oooh I think you'll find they can detect a difference. Those noses are very sensitive. I knew a bloke who worked his dog at C in obedience and his dog could differentiate between cloths wiped on different part of his owner's body (each to his own, we used tongs!). The main thing that affects a hounds or any canines scenting ability is stress IME.
 

Tiddlypom

Carries on creakily
Joined
17 July 2013
Messages
23,952
Location
In between the Midlands and the North
Visit site
Back when I was hunting long before the ban (mid 70s to early 80s) I didn't ever witness any overt blood thirstiness from any person. Barring one memorable occasion, the fox usually escaped outright and if hounds did mark it to ground, it was left there undisturbed.

The memorable occasion was once when the fox had gone to ground, for some reason (presumably the landowner's wishes) it was subsequently bolted from its hiding place with the hounds waiting close up to get their fox. We in the field were a little way back watching. Up popped the fox and it got clean away, leaving the hounds and hunt staff looking a trifle foolish. Quite a few of us cheered the fox, pleased that it had got away. We got a right bolloxing, mind 🤣. I was about 15 at the time.

The illegal hunts will be self selecting the nasty blood thirsty types who couldn't give a toss about the law.

The Avon Vale has long been known to be flouting the Hunting Act on a regular basis, but the governing did nothing to attempt to check them, and are thus complicit in creating the monster which was only revealed to the wider public by the hunt themselves revelling in their utterly abhorrent practices.
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,819
Visit site
I agree with this statement I've been drag hunting, it's fast and fun, when I mentioned this to some fox hunting people the reaction was that that is far too much for them.

It depends very much on the hunt. The Beaufort, for example, will be jumping walls all day long, the Berkely right next door is big hedge country, the Curre just over the Severn Bridge had no jumping at all the day I went out.
 

Kunoichi73

Beware... My Plants...
Joined
19 October 2022
Messages
11,320
Visit site
I think a lot of the resentment towards the ban was because it seemed so political; there was Tony Blair's unpopularity over the Gulf war and it was seen as his 'get out of jail free' card with his left wingers; old scores to be settled ('Thatcher closed the pits, now it's the toffs' turn') and the alleged huge donation to the Labour Party from PETA
If it had been seen purely as an animal welfare thing welfare issue the reaction might have been very different
I'm very anti 'real' hunting now but got sucked into the hype; I'm embarrassed to admit that I even signed Roger Scruton's stupid Hunting Declaration

I'm not a fan of hunting but at the time of the ban, part of me didn't want it to happen. Why? Because in some circles it had become part of that horrible British tradition of bigoted classism. I hate this attitude with a passion and I lost track of the number of people I heard say things like 'I'm all for this ban as it's one in the eye for the toffs'. It showed so much ignorance from city folk about how the countryside works.

I don't care where someone is from, what their background is or where they went to school etc and I hate that it is still acceptable to use this as a way to insult and judge people.
 

lizziebell

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 January 2009
Messages
1,398
Location
...in my wellies
Visit site
You seem to not understand much about ‘hunting the clean boot’! It is not trail hunting at all but using a pack of bloodhounds to follow the natural scent of human runners. Bloodhound packs along with true drag packs, are not governed by the BSHA, instead most belong to the Master of Drag and Bloodhounds Association.
Thank you TGM, ycbm has already pointed out my incorrect use of the terminology (and rudely by Clodagh). I never claimed to be an expert on any type of hunting, so chose the incorrect term, however my post stating the use of fox scent still stands correct.
 

lizziebell

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 January 2009
Messages
1,398
Location
...in my wellies
Visit site
I find it beyond unlikely that a dog that can sniff out cancer, can track people who have been missing for days, can find a set of car keys on a Moor but can’t tell the difference between stale fox urine and fresh running fox.
Pheasants and dummies are not hidden in plain sight.
I think, as with my use of incorrect terminology I shouldn’t have used the words “can’t tell the difference”, as that was simplifying how dogs process the information. Yes they can tell the difference between old and fresh scent, but that’s irrelevant to how dogs react to a scent. Dogs reactions aren’t to the scent itself, stale or fresh (it’s whatever scent the dog has been trained for) but the reward of what following/ finding that specific scent brings them. In Scentwork trials and training, you can get false indications from where an old scent article has been placed if the area hasn’t been cleaned well enough. I keep 2 jars containing scented articles. They get “refreshed” every 6 months. It doesn’t matter if I put down a freshly scented article or one that’s 6 months old - the find of the actual scent is the same for both, and the reward is equal for finding both (for my dog it’s cheese or a ball).
I don’t know how far in advance the foxhunting trail is laid (so if someone can educate me on this that would be great), so for arguments sake, let’s say it’s laid 45 minutes before the hounds get to it (I can’t see it being timed much closer as I guess the fun is taken out if you can actually see or hear the person laying the trail?) - there’s always going to be a chance that within that 45 minutes a fox has crossed that trail.
There is no justification for using a fox scent as it’s asking for “accidents” to happen.
 
Last edited:

shortstuff99

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 September 2008
Messages
7,167
Location
Over the wild blue yonder
Visit site

Sandstone1

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 July 2010
Messages
8,201
Visit site
He could have killed that sab, he should be arrested for that. Wheres the care for his horse too? Yet another isolated incident?
 

w1bbler

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 May 2011
Messages
1,087
Visit site
That's horrific. Looking at the comments, it appears people are justifying the huntsmans actions because the sabs were asked to move 😡 They are also claiming he walked into the path of the horse, but watching the clip, his back was turned away from the gate as he moved.
Can't wait to see how the pros on here justify this 🤪
 

SilverLinings

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 August 2017
Messages
3,170
Visit site
Hunting being noticed by the NYT too


That article seems to be behind a paywall- what's the NYT's opinion on it? Are they pro-foxhunting? Hunting in general is obviously quite a big thing in the US and still legal.
 

teapot

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 December 2005
Messages
37,392
Visit site
That article seems to be behind a paywall- what's the NYT's opinion on it? Are they pro-foxhunting? Hunting in general is obviously quite a big thing in the US and still legal.

You should be able to read it? (I didn’t pay to read it!) The article falls back on the class war issue, and sabs versus the hunts. Usual stuff!
 

shortstuff99

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 September 2008
Messages
7,167
Location
Over the wild blue yonder
Visit site
That article seems to be behind a paywall- what's the NYT's opinion on it? Are they pro-foxhunting? Hunting in general is obviously quite a big thing in the US and still legal.
The NYT for some reason loves an anti British article. So even if there is truth in there it will get a fair spin for why we are terrible 🤣. Not that we don't always deserve it.
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,819
Visit site

SilverLinings

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 August 2017
Messages
3,170
Visit site
You should be able to read it? (I didn’t pay to read it!) The article falls back on the class war issue, and sabs versus the hunts

I've managed to get to it by googling the article rather than going to it via the link :)

ETA having now read it the article seems to mainly be about the hunting issue being a class war, rather than any opinion on whether illegal hunting is right or wrong morally (obviously they must recognise it's at least wrong from a legal POV). Even the quotes they include from both sides mainly consist about comments on class which is disappointing as I think the issue is actually about far more than that (for both sides).
 
Last edited:

lizziebell

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 January 2009
Messages
1,398
Location
...in my wellies
Visit site
That's horrific. Looking at the comments, it appears people are justifying the huntsmans actions because the sabs were asked to move 😡 They are also claiming he walked into the path of the horse, but watching the clip, his back was turned away from the gate as he moved.
Can't wait to see how the pros on here justify this 🤪
That is horrendous! How can that be justified. Would these people also drive someone over if they stood in front of their car ?
 

shortstuff99

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 September 2008
Messages
7,167
Location
Over the wild blue yonder
Visit site
That's horrific. Looking at the comments, it appears people are justifying the huntsmans actions because the sabs were asked to move 😡 They are also claiming he walked into the path of the horse, but watching the clip, his back was turned away from the gate as he moved.
Can't wait to see how the pros on here justify this 🤪
I have had friends share this and laugh about it and think the huntsman did nothing wrong?! I just can't understand it, even if you've asked them to move etc you shouldn't jump anything if people are by it as anything could happen and it would be dangerous.

If I want to park my car and a pedestrian is in the way and I ask them to move and they don't, I then don't have the right to just run them over.
 

Miss_Millie

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 August 2020
Messages
1,306
Visit site
That is horrendous! How can that be justified. Would these people also drive someone over if they stood in front of their car ?

Yes. It happened quite recently and the lady was very lucky that she wasn't killed.

But no, these are just a few bad seeds, violent individuals are not rife in the hunting community, of course not... 🙃
 

Millionwords

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 January 2021
Messages
1,325
Visit site
Jesus chri$t, thats horrific.

And THE NUMBER OF COMMENTS Justifying the huntsmans actions!!!!
 

meleeka

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2001
Messages
11,605
Location
Hants, England
Visit site
I can’t remember if it’s come up before but where does the scent come from? I’m assuming that there’s a poor fox somewhere shut in a cage just so it’s urine can be collected?
 

SilverLinings

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 August 2017
Messages
3,170
Visit site
It was this hunt!

The governing body should be sanctioning them severely, that's two acts of violence against members of the public, both of which could have been fatal. That hunt clearly has a serious problem with whoever is running it if this type of behaviour is sanctioned, encouraged or just ignored. If a follower behaves like that then they should be banned from the hunt, and if it's hunt staff then they should be up before the BHSA for disciplinary action for at the very least bringing the sport into disrepute (plus facing any appropriate legal repercussions).
 
Top