minesadouble
Well-Known Member
I will never understand the argument that its acceptable to hunt/shoot to eat but not for sport.
Firstly it makes no difference to the living animal what happens to its carcass once it is dead.
Secondly we, as humans, do not NEED to eat meat to survive. We eat meat solely because we (most of us) enjoy the taste/texture of meat.
So, if you're not vegetarian you are just as guilty of causing the death of an animal for your enjoyment as anyone whose sporting interest results in the death of an animal.
If I had to choose to come back as either a chicken destined for the human food chain or a fox which may or may not be hunted by a pack of foxhounds I know which I'd choose.
Firstly it makes no difference to the living animal what happens to its carcass once it is dead.
Secondly we, as humans, do not NEED to eat meat to survive. We eat meat solely because we (most of us) enjoy the taste/texture of meat.
So, if you're not vegetarian you are just as guilty of causing the death of an animal for your enjoyment as anyone whose sporting interest results in the death of an animal.
If I had to choose to come back as either a chicken destined for the human food chain or a fox which may or may not be hunted by a pack of foxhounds I know which I'd choose.