Fieldlife
Well-Known Member
I cant see any bruising though as was suggested by another facebook poster?
C,I shall be very good and very disciplined and resist the temptation to even look, so I shall.
Though someone might have to cut my hands off. But I will die from high blood pressure if I look at her page.
the problem for me is not whether the horse is BF, I'm sure he is better shod and I am not sure where the bruising has come into it, nor the fact that they are no worse that some other shod feet but simply that a vet regards them as good.
I see them as this. I think, but maybe wrong as I don't know who this is, that her riding horses are all relatively young. If I had bought a horse with feet like this I would expect the vet to point this out to me.I know the farrier most certainly would do.The under run heel is very common in long term shod horses. But it’s worrying when an equine vet seems unable to see the issue.
The horse in the video doesn't look hugely happy.
the problem for me is not whether the horse is BF, I'm sure he is better shod and I am not sure where the bruising has come into it, nor the fact that they are no worse that some other shod feet but simply that a vet regards them as good.
I see them as this. I think, but maybe wrong as I don't know who this is, that her riding horses are all relatively young. If I had bought a horse with feet like this I would expect the vet to point this out to me.I know the farrier most certainly would do.
It doesn't take much imagination, or at least it doesn't to me, to see where they will be in a couple of years time.
Because I have been studying this today, I will also add for a defamation case to succeed than the claimant has to also show that they have suffered or likely to suffer "serious harm" from the publication.I have recently spoken to legal and if what you have written is true, and if it is a reasonable opinion to take from the facts (ie others would come to the same opinion) than crack on.
I did see the post and I have come to the same opinion as you!
Interesting that the farrier comes from miles away, so either she doesn't think any of the local ones are up to the job, or they didn't want to do it. I wonder why?I feel a bit sorry for the farrier that appears to have literally shod the horse once & has been publicly name dropped on the page, to be honest.
Edited for school girl spelling errors.
I cant see any bruising though as was suggested by another facebook poster?
Interesting that the farrier comes from miles away, so either she doesn't think any of the local ones are up to the job, or they didn't want to do it. I wonder why?
I think their regular farrier was away.
The farrier whose work everyone is now judging, literally shod her horses as cover.
Hmmm, given past knowledge of the page in question, I'm not so sure the regular farrier is actually just 'taking a break'.
I don't think anyone is judging the new farrier's work at all, it's what a vet is describing as a 'good' or even 'ideal' or 'perfect' foot which is the issue.
Or hoof porn.
I was reading the comments on both vet and Mo pages on FB this morning and I had to have a word with myself for putting myself through that. why do I do it
I’m not that clued up on feet so I enjoy a thread discussing hooves and those that have an understanding of good feet pointing out faults so I can learn a bit more, regardless of who’s hooves are being discussed.
Well, as per usual it's not very educational is it? Calling those feet perfect and being so dismissive to anyone who dares question anything isn't teaching anyone anything, so what's the point? The poor farrier probably wont be getting any new customers off the back of it.
So he glues the shoes on...? Or do you mean double clips?My farrier doesn't like shoes with toe clips, and he wouldn't cut that much out of the wall either, but
that is what I was trying to say. Not about the farriers shoeing but that she posted the feet as being perfect examples. They are not. However her followers will look at the pics, see how nice they look, think the farrier has done a good job in making them look nice and go away thinking that their own feet look just the same so they must be equally brilliant.Well, as per usual it's not very educational is it? Calling those feet perfect and being so dismissive to anyone who dares question anything isn't teaching anyone anything, so what's the point? The poor farrier probably wont be getting any new customers off the back of it.
Thanks, this explains it well. I had to Google HPA but now understand it a lot better.The most basic concept that SV seems to be oblivious of is that in a perfect foot viewed from the side, the line of the heel should be parallel to the line of the toe (and both in line with the HPA). In these feet it clearly isn't, meaning the heel tubules are being pulled forwards and the back of the foot is weaker, not to mention the imbalanced forces and compromises happening internally nor compensations made in the soft tissues and body higher up. (There will be foot gurus who will explain it better than me.)
Whilst the feet aren’t great, I’m seeing a decent stab by the stand in farrier at shoeing to the feet that he was presented with.He's shod it to account for the state of the feet in front of him, and to encourage a bit of improvement (hard without a complete management rethink) - I'm surprised anyone thinks they're not too bad, they're definitely not very good ...
Don't hold out much hope of them staying on though.
I hope he's ok with his work being posted on a Facebook page with a large following.