ester
Not slacking multitasking
I've driven ponies I wouldn't ride, and obviously there is two of you on carriage too. Good carriages are light and well balanced and pretty easy to pull - they did human pulled scurry last week at hopetoun ?
It's nothing to do with body positivity or "fat shaming" (the same would apply with a very muscular person who was a heavy weight) it's about animal welfare and what we impose on an animal shaped like a suspension bridge.
Understood, I don't know much about it just assumed most horses of a good build would be able to pull an overweight rider better than to have one sat on them. Tiny scurry ponies seem to pull two average weight adults at speed, so if you could source a light vehicle then you could make it work?
It is such a contentious and complicated issue with so many factors. I do believe that there are many riders too big for their horses, absolutely, and I don't like to encounter it... but I don't think a 'ceiling weight' would ever work as it depends on so many things. Everyone has different ideas about it too, sometimes I read the maximum weight people think is OK for a horse and it's lower than what I would think was fine! There is of course a point when I think people probably won't be able to find a suitable horse to carry them but hard to put a cap on it, so to speak. My OH is about 16st 4lbs and a beginner and I have no issue with him riding certain horses and firmly believe they can carry him. But I do think we are seeing more and more heavier riders who are not suitably mounted.
It's funny to encounter this topic this morning as yesterday I posted a canter clip from a ride I did in Mongolia in a FB horsey group. Someone very quickly screenshotted a moment showing one of the Mongolian horsemen on a particularly tiny Mongolian Horse with the phrase "OMG", evidently appalled, but there was not one moment in Mongolia when I didn't feel comfortable with those tiny horses carrying me, the riders in my group or the local horsemen and women. They are miniscule but absolutely as tough as nails and it didn't bother me at all. Equally I have ridden many horses on trips abroad who were smaller than I would choose for myself but they were fit and up to the task in my opinion.
Except it is. If you read this thread there are many many references made to fat and very few made to weight regardless of size and shape.
I stopped riding when I hit a weight I wasnt comfortable with, and I've lost over 3 stone to be able to ride again. Still 2 stone to go before I dont anything particularly exiciting riding wise as well. Its hard. Once you've been fat you will forever need to eat less than a person of the same size and shape who has never been fat. Your body will do everything it can to trick you into being fat again. It is a daily battle. I have no idea if I can maintain that for the rest of my life. Most people cant.
So I have no issue discussing weight and imposing limits. But some of the comments on this thread are unpleasant to read and very definitely about fat rather than weight
A horse should not be pulling one person it must always be two .
The heavier the carriage the more stable it will be it’s safer ,scurrying is for the skilled it’s like the difference between a hack and and a speed class showjumping
Horse pulling uphill is working very hard I watched my weight when I was driving and I drove large horses .
It is a daily battle and it’s hard for those with a uncomplicated relationship with food to understand what it’s like .
It’s like being unshackled from a mad person when you get it under control.
I would not assume that you have a lower base metabolic rate than a thin person I have had mine measured and I came out of a diet with it at 1250 per day higher than I went into the diet with .
My observation is that most thin people just do things differently to what I would if left to my own devices .
Theres two people in my head one is very sensible about food eating and self care and the other is a certified nut job coming to terms with controlling the nut job on a full time basis is hard work but it can be done .
Yes those horses in the past lead miserable short unhappy lives .
I have friends who compete driving ponies and they watch their weights very very carefully .
See I figured we were talking max weight for the hypothetical most weight carrying horse
The peer reviewed research says very different sadly. I havent got a link to the research to hand, but this explains it fairly well
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/magazine/tara-parker-pope-fat-trap.html
Cavalry horses carry and how long are they on duty for on a regular basis?
I would guess they stayed sounder as they were ridden mostly in straight lines, on varying surfaces and were fit.I do think a lot of this must also be related to horse fitness - just thinking about back in (let's say) Georgian times, when many people rode as transport, and unless you were rich you wouldn't be able to afford to seriously break your horse. Leaving aside the fact that there probably were many poorly treated working horses back then, horses in general must have been very fit, muscled and used to daily hard work. So they'd have presumably been better able to cope with carrying weight than your average "hacked a few times a week" horse today. Also, I wonder whether the average man's riding horse back then (I'm excluding women because women on the whole seem to have been much smaller then) would have been more of a hunter type (if you were rich) or a cob type (for the middle class). Therefore more bone and substance than the many TBs and ISHs around now.
Those are just my thoughts, I don't know how accurate they are - what I need is a historian specialising in the history of the riding horse! Anyone know one?!
I can't think of another sport where there are 'fat' athletes competing.
Being facetious I can think of a few.. shot put, power lifting, strong man, darts, pool, discus, hammer throw, wrestling, sumo, boxing, rugby.
None of those sports require you to sit on a living breathing animal to compete in it though.
For those commenting on “how easily a horse did xyz” with someone of a larger weight?
How would you quantify this?
Just because the horse obliged to do so? They are pretty agreeable creatures and we put them through a lot including (not intentionally) saddles they don’t like, bits they don’t like - but when we notice that we do something about it.
Just a thought, but the Maximum weight limit has to also take into account the riding activity you want to do. The maximum weight a horse can carry doing a gentle walk on easy terrain will be totally different to a days hunting, for example.
So, taking into account:
So no, virtually impossible to come by a general maximum weight rule, other than common sense
- The actual weight of the rider
- The fitness of the rider (muscle vs fat, athleticism)
- The riding ability of the rider
- The suitability of the horse
- The fitness of the horse
- The schooling level of the horse for the activity
- The riding activity involved (length of time in the saddle and speed)
![]()
I'm not looking for a general maximum rule I am looking for an absolute maximum - even for a short, gentle walkin straight lines on the best weight carrying horse.
- bit too sweary for work, I love the approach he brings to health and weight.
though cycling I don't think many people give much thought to whether they go over the manufacturers weight limit - maybe it depends on how far up you are/how far you might fall.Interesting how comparisons to other sports equipment were made in terms of them “breaking” under a maximum weight and these were generally accepted purely from a safety perspective.