whiteroom
Active Member
Wow, that will be expensive!
Kent vet
- Thread starter hoggedmane
- Start date
Wow, that will be expensive!
LD&S
Well-Known Member
Does anyone know if the case is still ongoing?
JanetGeorge
Well-Known Member
It was still going on Tuesday - still looking for anything more recent.
ETA - found it. It was still going today!
LD&S
Well-Known Member
Crikey it must be costing a fortune
Alec Swan
Well-Known Member
^^^^ Yes, but who?
Alec.
Alec.
JanetGeorge
Well-Known Member
US! With luck they'll get a hefty financial hit if they're convicted - but not enough to cover the costs. Or they'll go to prison at our expense. I say, Bring back the Birch!
cobgoblin
Bugrit! Millennium hand and shrimp.
They were up to witness 53 yesterday ( Friday).
whiteroom
Active Member
Aniela Jurecka is advertising on Facebook today!
benson21
Well-Known Member
Now I think thats really wrong! If you are in court for something like drink driving, surely they are not allowed to drive. So why on earth is she still be allowed to sell?
Alec Swan
Well-Known Member
Has Ms. Jurecka been found guilty yet? If she hasn't, then the Court will have to wait until she is, assuming that she is, and then the Court could place an order preventing her from trading, perhaps.
Alec.
YorksG
Over the hill and far awa
Drunk driving is an "absolute" offence, the evidence and proof are obtained when the breath/blood sample is given, although the driving ban is the sentence given by the court, so I understand that you can drive until conviction ( insurance may be tricky).. If the defendant is pleading not guilty then of course she can continue to trade, we do still have the rule of innocent until proved guilty.
benson21
Well-Known Member
Ok, my mistake, I just find it heartbreaking as, after what happened to , I can still see it happening to others.No, she hasnt been found guilty yet, but I know what happened in my case!
whiteroom
Active Member
This seems very messy - Ms Jurecka I understand is also known as Anni Inceman (Willow Sport Horses?) Coincidentally ads from Ms Jurecka and Ms Inceman seem to be the same in several intances. Innocent until proven guilty of course but this is a tangled web,
cobgoblin
Bugrit! Millennium hand and shrimp.
For anyone who's interested they were up to witness 67 on Friday 13th.
Clodagh
Well-Known Member
I never look at any horse ads in Kent, just to be on the safe side of not looking at anything dodgy. I feel sorry for legitimate Kent sellers!
LD&S
Well-Known Member
OMG It must be costing a bloody fortune, I hope they are all found guilty
Last edited:
Wundahorse
Well-Known Member
I somehow anticipate tax payers will end up burdened by the financial responsibility of this case. I can imagine all parties will insist they have no income to find any prospective fines. If they get a custodial sentence it will still be the state that pays.
Ms Jurecka is still very much in business in Kent. By all accounts she seems unrepentant.
Ms Jurecka is still very much in business in Kent. By all accounts she seems unrepentant.
whiteroom
Active Member
Indeed, the accused all seem to be merrily going about their business, the question is whether or not is it legitimate! Ms Jurecka is advertising for internal stabling so I guess she is expanding....
emmafielding
Active Member
They are probably all merrily going about their business without a care or shame, Mr David Smith is for one, gelding several cobs in Shadoxhurst, Ashford on Saturday 14th just gone for CASH in Hand, cobs in Chartham Nr Canterbury last month so he is doing ok even with the Tax man. In court all week & working for cash the weekends, Its a joke witness No68 today
emmafielding
Active Member
And as for innocent until proven guilty, they should have all assets & stock frozen, suspended from any trading what so ever, As for the Vet suspended from any form of trade, business or practice. Doctors, policemen are fully suspended pending further inquiries etc. Why should they be allowed to trade, work or earn neither gave a dam about anything whilst they were conning or taking advantage, crown court & 68++ witnesses is not for nothing, at the very least l hope the vet rots
Forum Admin Team
Forum Administrators
Alec Swan
Well-Known Member
Well done Admin, an honourable stance, very well done indeed.
Alec.
Alec.
MrsB
Well-Known Member
Soooo.... we weren't wrong. We weren't liars. It's been proven in court that these people were guilty. And I'm so very glad that justice has been served.
spottybotty
Well-Known Member
Lets just hope they get the sentence they deserve.
Snuffles
Well-Known Member
I very much doubt it.
benson21
Well-Known Member
All been sentenced this morning, all receiving 2 1/2 years in prison, serving half of it in prison,and half out on license. So, to all of the people slagging us off, telling us we were liars.....does this prove our point!!!
YorksG
Over the hill and far awa
Just as an asside, those other professions/jobs are salaried and people are suspended on full pay, self-employed people would not be able to earn a living, which may well be appropriate following a finding of guilt, but is hardly so before any such finding.
I am pleased that these three have been found guilty and hope that assests are seized to at least pay back the money they defrauded others of.
NooNoo59
Well-Known Member
Good should all be served in prison but it's better than nothing has smith be struck off now ?
cobgoblin
Bugrit! Millennium hand and shrimp.
Alec Swan
Well-Known Member
Interesting, thanks. Considering that Smith has now been judged and found guilty, that will leave the door wide open for those unfortunates who were reliant upon his professional services, and who he failed. With luck, the process will bankrupt him, and rightly so.
Of the other two, who knows? If they have no assets, then Smith will will take the hit.
Alec.