asmp
Well-Known Member
https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/lemieux-ltd-a22-1144699-lemieux-ltd.html
To be fair though, it‘s not their product!
To be fair though, it‘s not their product!
Is it??!The manufacturer said that “slut” was a term commonly used by horse trainers to refer to a problem filly.
What a strange name to give a product.
I work in a primary school and would not use that word at school, nor the T word, or the word of a female dog at school as a descriptor.
Maybe that would be a good test of a name, weather you would teach the word to a primary aged child?
I had no qualms about teaching my kids that a female canine is called a bitch, or that a male fowl is called a cock.
But I also made sure that they understood that if they wanted to use these words, then it should always be in the context of animals and to be very careful of using them around Americans.
I have to be very careful when writing to my female French friends, because I often miss out the letter "a" of the word "salut".
Out of interest why do you have to be careful using them round only Americans? Bitch would be considered a swear word in the UK too, and cock! Ive never heard Americans use cock as a swear word?
i so agree with this.Mares are also entire with all the hormones, and an equally strong desire to breed - but they are expected to get on with it, and behave like geldings. If they don't they are 'mare-ish'.
The way we manage stallions and mares in the equine industry is oddly misogynistic in itself.
Stallions have to be stabled on their own, or turned out in paddocks with very high fences.
And we must be very careful not to upset them by having mares anywhere near them.
Mares are also entire with all the hormones, and an equally strong desire to breed - but they are expected to get on with it, and behave like geldings. If they don't they are 'mare-ish'.
It's a throwback to the days when men couldn't be expected to control their urges if a woman wore the wrong clothes.
there are stallions and stallions though. i've no doubt some are raving sex maniacs but i know a good few people who keep them like "normal horses" without a problem, obv a few considerations but they are perfectly able to live with company and enjoy normal horse behaviours.
I occasionally meet someone else who is clearly terrified of her stallion and it's her that makes him a menace. He doesn't get turnout or contact with other horses and unsurprisingly he's a touch unreasonable as a result.
i guess what i took from shils' comment is that people make the necessary arrangements to keep a stallion, if they want to keep one. and expect to have to do so. but lots of people get frustrated with their mares who have to fit in with the standard paint-by-numbers offering on your average livery yard despite possibly also having their own needs and challenges.
I don't disagree completely with what you're saying, but it's two different situations entirely which dictate how they are kept. There is one stallion to multiple mares, you wouldn't get mares fighting to the death over a stallion whereas vice versa you quite possibly could, so it's more important to keep the stallion contained; it also makes sense because there are less of them and the mare is only intermittently intent on being bred whereas with stallions it's 24/7. It's the same in cows, sheep, piga, alpacas etc etc etc. Is it sexism? Or just how the world of breeding animals works?
Unfortunately 'slut' is occasionally used on this forum when an owner is describing their in season mare. Who, IMHO, they don't deserve to own if they can't be kinder.It's interesting that a mare, who maybe has hormonal problems, is called a slut for showing that she is female.
I find the word offensive whatever species it is used about. I have been involved with leisure horses for over 50 years and it is not a term that I have come across.
Superb post.The way we manage stallions and mares in the equine industry is oddly misogynistic in itself.
Stallions have to be stabled on their own, or turned out in paddocks with very high fences.
And we must be very careful not to upset them by having mares anywhere near them.
Mares are also entire with all the hormones, and an equally strong desire to breed - but they are expected to get on with it, and behave like geldings. If they don't they are 'mare-ish'.
It's a throwback to the days when men couldn't be expected to control their urges if a woman wore the wrong clothes.
If you wish to replicate feral horse behaviour (which some aspects of your post suggests) then stallions/colts can get along very nicely indeed in bachelor herds.
So why do we turn them out alone?
And both mares and stallions have a breeding cycle that is largely controlled by day length - so stallions are not '24/7' but have peaks and troughs in their hormones as mares do (for example anoestrous in the winter). Here in the UK, hormone activity seems to peak in April/May.
My understanding, and I won't claim to be anywhere near an expert on it, is that the fluctuation in stallion hormonally is much much smaller than that of a mare, and they generally speaking they will be open to mating near on any time if there is a mare in season presented - the basis of AI collection.
They absolutely can get along nicely in bachelor herds, but should you walk an in season mare past the bachelor herd to get to her field or on a hack it will kick off terribly, whereas should you walk a stallion near mares there will be interest but likely no fighting in any real ernest. In my experience anyway