sbloom
Well-Known Member
To suggest that a lame horse should be asked to do things without saying that I put from that horses vet is completely unethical.
If thats what’s happening this programme has to go into the snake oil category I am afraid .
There might be people out there saying what Dexter says their saying, what others are saying it is can't be controlled, but it is not how the course is spoken about by those in it or those delivering it. Nothing is black and white, and many horses on the programme get referred to vets either right at the beginning if they post an initial post for assessment/recommendations, or later on if, with a horse that doesn't appear to have had vet-level issues, when such an issue is revealed.
There are many horses on there though where they have been seen by countless bodyworkers and vets to no avail, and some horses are improved massively on the course. How does one talk about that? Unless you think Celeste a liar she works with vets in her area, especially when they can't get to the root of a problem.
I do not think she's perfect, I do not put her on a pedestal and am prepared to be disappointed (to an extent I was a little disappointed at how she dealt with some issues unrelated to the training itself) but until I see something else that helps horse AND their owners in such a way (after all it's so often US that need the help first), or see horses being harmed, I'll keep recommending it.
I'm also disappointed that she's had abuse against her on social media, and against her family.
10 years ago I was ridiculed within saddle fitting for saying that napping during a saddle fitting was just a horse being naughty, and have taken flack for all sorts of stuff over the years. My shoulders are broad (they have to be to be a saddle fitter). It'll all come out in the wash, one way or another.