Booboos
Well-Known Member
Of course I understand the difference between coincidence and causality. To suggest that all riders who wear red underwear produce winning horses because of it is likely to be coincidence as there is no reasonable connection between red underwear and performance. To suggest that a training system that produces winning horses does so because of the training system is causality because of the nature of the two things that are connected: a system for winning and a result of wins.
I never said that either all horses that are trained in rollkur will win, nor that only the horses that are trained in rollkur will win. Just that the success of some of the horses that are trained in this system is sufficient reason for anyone who wants to take up this system. The same holds for other successful systems.
I never said that either all horses that are trained in rollkur will win, nor that only the horses that are trained in rollkur will win. Just that the success of some of the horses that are trained in this system is sufficient reason for anyone who wants to take up this system. The same holds for other successful systems.