AshTay
Well-Known Member
First of all - what a horrendous thing to do to a living creature and well done for those involved in the rescue.
But looking at it from the RSPCA's perspective - they get a call about a colt in poor condition who was ALLEGEDLY found dumped but is now in the care of a member of the public. They don't know for sure that this person wasn't originally responsible for the colt getting like this. So they can either believe the person and take on the colt or they can not believe the person and prosecute them for seemingly allowing the colt to get into that state. As it was, they didn't prosecute (because they're not stupid and could see this was all genuine) but they did fund some treatment.
If they didn't have rules and guidelines to adhere to in cases like this they could be exploited when they are called to a genuine case of neglect by the owner if the owner then decides to weave a web of lies about where the horse was when it got into that state ("No officer, I found him dumped out on the bridleway like this and I bought him here").
Another poiint is - they've got a member of the public who has taken the colt in and started vet treatment and appears to be able to fund this. They're a charity and as such have other colts lining up to have vet treatment paid for.
I don't like it when threads turn into RSPCA-bashing when the information is passed through chinese-whispers-style from a friend of a friend and the original words of those involved gets distorted and taken out of context.
But looking at it from the RSPCA's perspective - they get a call about a colt in poor condition who was ALLEGEDLY found dumped but is now in the care of a member of the public. They don't know for sure that this person wasn't originally responsible for the colt getting like this. So they can either believe the person and take on the colt or they can not believe the person and prosecute them for seemingly allowing the colt to get into that state. As it was, they didn't prosecute (because they're not stupid and could see this was all genuine) but they did fund some treatment.
If they didn't have rules and guidelines to adhere to in cases like this they could be exploited when they are called to a genuine case of neglect by the owner if the owner then decides to weave a web of lies about where the horse was when it got into that state ("No officer, I found him dumped out on the bridleway like this and I bought him here").
Another poiint is - they've got a member of the public who has taken the colt in and started vet treatment and appears to be able to fund this. They're a charity and as such have other colts lining up to have vet treatment paid for.
I don't like it when threads turn into RSPCA-bashing when the information is passed through chinese-whispers-style from a friend of a friend and the original words of those involved gets distorted and taken out of context.