Yep i wouldnt be able to put my sons death to rest with the questions that there are hanging over it all! (hypothetically...i dont have a son...you know what i mean!)
All i can think is if she had her seat belt ON, they wouldn't be dead.......
Human bodies can't cope with stopping very very quickly and that why they both died....
and now please, please, please remember how good she was when she was alive
not this rubbish...
it's only for the fact she had such a very 'common death' that people can't cope with
and don't let's forget that she wasn't a 'saint' or 'holy' - she was a 'mere' woman with bulimia, a roving eye for the men and basically 'human' and 'fallible'
What *I'd* like to know is WHY we as taxpayers are wasting money investigating a traffic accident when the Police are stating they are too broke to properly investigate crimes that affect us all - like tack theft, burglary, car theft, muggings, etc.
Everyone is so keen to get rid of the House of Lords due to 'privilege' and yet 'privilege' is what is keeping this traffic accident with a drunk driver front page news.
Get real
The woman is DEAD
Leave it alone
Personally I think there is something SICK about people who cannot stop pondering this (and the death of JFK)
You cannot resurrect them. Leave them to rest in peace.
[ QUOTE ]
not really, main one she didn't wear a selt belt!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
They say if she had she would have been mushed anyhow. Thats not the question though, nothing will ever bring either of them back but connections still have a right to know whether it was murder.
God thats narrowminded. You don't think that there could have been a cover up, don't believe everything you're told.
There's such a thing as MI5 and MI6....
Diana was a loose canon that needed silencing.
For one the car that clipped them (which caused them to crash not the so called drunk driver) was never found, nobody ever owned up as the driver (now think of the money they could have made through mags and newspaper stories as the person to blame for Princess Diana's death). Travelling at the speed they were doing the driver needn't have been drunk to lose control when a car had clipped their own car.
lots of people killed in car crashes are mothers, daughters, sons, sisters, etc and are the sole breadwinner of the family - which wasn't the case in this instance
her bit on the side wasn't apparently her 'fiance' as the ring was worn on her right hand and her sons - who should know - state that she wasn't engaged
her posh car was supposed as a mercedes to be 'sooooo' safe - and normal people in ford fiestas don't have that protection
she wasn't wearing a seat belt
her driver was drunk
the car was driven at excessive speed
her driver took drugs
she was out on the razzle with her bit on the side
sorry - but take away her title and she was a normal death in a car accident
to be honest i do agree with what your saying although many people can be 'over the limit' when not drunk. I know of a mate who went out nightclubbing. went to pick his car up at one the next afternoon and was pulled up and fined for 'being over the limit'. Now in no way am i condoning drink driving in any way before everyone jumps on me, in fact i despise those that do but all I'm trying to say is that it is sometimes very easy to say someone had alcohol in their system.
as for what happened who knows...if i was al fayed I would want to know exactly what happened to my son just as i imagine harry and william want to know what happened to their mum.
So everyone who is out with their partner is actually with their 'bit on the side'. As far as I am aware neither of them were in a marriage or relationsip with anyone other than each other so how was he her bit on the side
The car was driven with speed to avaoid the paparazzi which aparantly followed them into the tunnel.
Witness say that the driver didnt drink at all that day and pictures show the three of them plus the bodyguard coming out of the hotel together.
Now think about it, why would a woman who loved her children sooo much, knowingly get into a car that was to be driven by a drunk or someone on drugs.
There are now rumours going around that the blood samples from the driver weren't actually his - they were mixed up
Isnt everyone, whether they are royalty or normal everyday people allowed to go out with their partners. Or is she being condemmed for having a life outside the royal family.
What has happened to the bodyguard that survived? No-one seems to have heard from him and he is the only one that can tell anyone what really happened - hence the royal familys involvement there.
Be honest, have you NEVER got into the back of a car and not put your sealtbelt on????
Who even knows if he did have alcohol in his blood? If he did he could have easily been spiked. Do you really think the three of them, a mother, a trained bodygaurd would have got into a car with a drunk man. Do you think that a trained bodyguard wouldn't have noticed the driver was drunk part way into the journey...c'mon 2 + 3 doesn't make 4!
i agree. someone. somewhere that night would have known / or seen if that driver was doing drugs and/or drinking. If it wasnt an accident SOMEONE out there must know the truth.
I remeber that day very well (as I'm sure most do). I was at a one day event with my pony and saw it one the news as i got up very early. There was also a one minute silence as I entered the showjumping arena - was very eeriee walking round ready to start my round whilst that went on - think it was an event at rockbourne when i lived down south.
their mother was killed in a car crash when driven by a drunk and drugged up driver
what more do they want to know
the 'diana adoration' is obscene
she is NOT a reincarnation of Jesus Christ/Mohammed or whatever
she was a fallible woman with problems and a sex drive
AND the amount of cash wasted on that 'lawn' of flowers when she died could have done SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much good for sick children and cancer patients for example
what a waste of money
and yes - I might not say things that are 'popular' but they are things a lot of people think but are too 'scared' by the 'adore diana' brigade to stand up and say
I dont adore diana as you put it. In fact I think that some of her ocharity work was stunted and she only had one expression in her photos... HOWEVER... why would a devoted mother get into a car with a drunk/drugged driver, why would the sober bodyguard allow it, why would the witness have said that the driver was sober, why would there be accusations regarding the drivers positive blood test,
Why should a woman who IS NOT married not be allowed a partner or a sex drive, and woman do have problems. There is nothing abnormal about that.
What I am saying is there has to be an explanation to the unanswered questions that he sons must have. I personally believe that these will come out eventually and then it will be laid down to rest.
many drunk people can appear sober - particularly if they are habitual drinkers - and I know a friend who's husband is an alcoholic - he can appear perfectly sober and still be about 6x over the driving limit !!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you've never been with an alcoholic you cannot know how 'sober' they can appear.
The bodyguard was there to assess external threats, paparazzi, etc. He wasn't supposed to check a trustworthy employee (and probably vetted employee) of the lover of his charge
It has been scientifically proven and reported this weekend that the blood taken from Paul was his and that he was significantly drunk
diana got into the car 'cos it was her lovers; the driver was her lovers driver; and she'd been in the car before
her sons need this to 'go away' not to have it endlessly repeated like a bad curry when the newspapers are short of other stories
let the woman rest in peace
and more importantly - let her sons have peace !!!!!!!!!!
this 'witch hunt' is cruel, obscene, nasty, vicarious and smacks of the McCarthy 'witch hunts' of the 50's in the USA
Surely we have progressed in civilisation in 60 years to be beyond this level of voyerism ??
or is everyone else on here so obsessed with the 'diana legend' that they cannot see how distressing it is 10 years on to the family ????????????
I have lived thru a tragedy involving the murderous arson of my horse and other horses.
10 years on I still find it distressing that people say 'oh - isnt' that the place where all those horses died?'
LEAVE people who are bereaved ALONE with their grief and to remember the good times
PLEASE don't keep raking up the bad times/death
You just do NOT realise the effect you and others can have by doing this if you haven't been personally involved in a violent death of someone/something close to you.
LEAVE IT ALONE and let the family get on with their lives
They want to remember the good times and the good things she did
they don't need/want to have the death and destruction bit raked over timeaftertimeaftertimeaftertimeaftertime
I have to say if it were a case of a drunk driver, this wouldn't still be going on 10 years after the fact. The police would have been able to close the case on this years ago (considering the driver died, and there was no need for a trial) I am not a consipracy theorist, and I do believe it was a series of tragic events (paprazzi, driving too fast, no seat belt) that contributed to the deaths of the 3 people in that car. I don't have any qualms about the fact Diana was with Dodi - they were in a relationship (engaged or not - young teenage sons don't know everything about their parents) - it wasn't a case of 'bit on the side' or any other slur, they were both consenting adults.
Bodyguards are highly trained, and I don't doubt for an instant that he would have known if the driver were drunk
You also commented on the flowers - people deal with grief in different ways, paying tribute, be it with flowers, teddy bears or other tokens helps them to grieve. She was a public figure, that did a lot for charity, and people did feel very upset at her death. I also think there has been a lack of closure, I hope that this week will bring closure.
I guess you can make up conspiracy theories ad infinitum. They cant be disproved.
But that she was killed deliberatly ? Was she really such a risk to ... someone ... ? I dont think so.
It would have been an embaressment to the Royal family to have the mother of a future king married to a muslim.
Personally I think that the Royals arranged for this to happen. Dodi and the driver were just collateral damage.
However, i also feel that everyone is entitled to their opinions and to view them equally.
I dont think we will know the truth for many years to come.
Jo if you think the royals arranged it then you really have been reading too much fiction.
Personally, I don't care..the conspiracy theories will never go away and those boys and Prince Charles will have this hanging over them for as long as somebody wants to keep it open