ester
Not slacking multitasking
which makes £50 seem like a lot of money LL.
Shilasdair, if you'd get your foot out of your mouth for a moment, you would realise that your first paragraph above makes an assumption that you can't quantify. What I said was that I wouldn't have a tb over a cob or native because I have no experience in handling tbs. I did not say that I have no experience full stop or that cobs and natives are suitable for novices.
I don't have to justify myself, but am going to - one of my 'rescues' is a cob who came from a very well to do family that could be classed as 'all the gear and no idea'. He was cut late and is riggy, he thought he ruled the world and had no need for manners, he couldn't be led anywhere in hand, his feet were overgrown, he was wormy, hadn't been groomed for years so matted coat, mane and tail, ran away when ridden, was headshy, would try to have your head off with his feet if you got near his back end to sort his man cave out (after being cut late - I didn't blame him); now he is a lovely old softy in his thirties who is so laid back you wouldn't believe it - he never was a novices horse though - but that is what he started out as and why get got abandoned in a field with a mini shettie for company. By that time he'd been chucked off every livery yard in the vicinity and it was only the kindness of local residents who took feed to the pair of them that got them through the winter before I came along. I think it does qualify me slightly in knowing a little bit about re-habbing a rescue.
. If ALL of the equine charities were outlawed, we'd very soon return to a more ethical and humane system of equine management.
Alec.
I think the big difference are farmers are out to make money and provide a good quality end product. No farmer worth their salt wants a poor animal, that has poor feet and creates vets bills and the food that is put into them has to create towards a carcass with a value. The farm animal food industry is very clear about how little food the farmer needs to use, where as with horses they encourage spending over common sense.I'll go further than Shilasdair's excellent and opening post. Would most agree that our average farm livestock creatures, Beef animals, and Lambs, have a reasonable, humane and cared for life? Has anyone stopped to think and perhaps ask why we have so many equine welfare cases, when compared with those of farm livestock? Would others consider that if our horses had a final sale value, then they would be as well cared for as our farm livestock? Would others accept that if those who keep horses in the most dire of conditions, had what was considered to be an asset, then they would at least take greater care of it?
Can anyone explain to me (apart from the rather obvious differences), where the difference lays between our farm livestock and our equines? It seems to me that we care for one, but not the other. Kindness and cruelty are most often bed-fellowws, sadly.
None of the equine charities will support an ethical slaughter system for our equines, for the very simple reason that it will impinge upon their abilities to raise charitable funds. The equine charities, ALL OF THEM, should be ashamed in that they promote their charitable work, by having the evidence, horses in need of charitable euthanasia. If ALL of the equine charities were outlawed, we'd very soon return to a more ethical and humane system of equine management.
Alec.
You bought a rude cob from a 'well to do' background, and restored some discipline.
That's lovely, but it's not a rescue. I bought an ex orphan weanling, who had never had her feet trimmed, was underweight and needed worming. I couldn't catch her for about 2 weeks.. Also not a 'rescue', and my ability to care for her should be the expectation, not something to congratulate me on.
And you're proving my point re cobs - yours came from a decent background, but wasn't suitable for a novice.
S
ETA mine was a bit rough because the lady whose mare fostered her broke her collar bone and struggled for a month or two, nothing sinister.
_GG_ I think you have just told me off!
Anyway for what it's worth, I do think that charity subsidised euthanisia is a good idea. It may break the hearts of some owners, but it is a better end than being passed from pillar to post if someone finds themselves in dire straits and is unable even to fund the cost themselves. I also think that the charities need to be a little less stringent in their ideals for re-homing. We can't all have perfect yards, but if the knowledge, skill and good intention is there, then they should stop worrying so much about the minutae - perhaps a home visit and a knowledge 'test' before making a decision. That is not to say though they should go to the extremes of saying everyone must have passed a minimum of the BHS Stages exams! But that they know enough about day to day stable management to cope and that they have a vet and farrier lined up from the start.
As to the overbreeding by a certain element of the community, while they will defend their right to breed equines as they have done so for so many years, they need to be made to stop! Or at the very least cut down their production to sustainable levels. Sooner or later they are going to overwhelm not only those who can effect a rescue, the charities and the meat man and then the level of welfare troubles really will escalate out of control.
Also, I believe that the charities themselves need some kind of regulation to stop just anyone buying up some scrappy equines and setting themselves up. There's one not far from me, which is trying it's hardest, but they are of the sort that can't say no, and they're going to run out of room soon.
_GG_ your post in particular has spurred me into action - what can we do to help solve the problem? If anyone has any ideas please share them here
http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?671282-Lets-create-a-solution
I am more than willing to give my time to support forming an organisation to help tackle the cause, rather than plugging a hole.
And people - please do not condemn Shils or anyone for disagreeing with what I have done with Oreo. It is something that I did in a moment of weakness and although I don't regret doing it when I see his little face, it doesn't actually help the plight of these horses in any way - just one.
So the question Shils is are you willing to help create a solution? If a group of us got together and set up an organisation with the aim of promoting PTS as a valid alternative to rehoming, would you want to be a part of it? Genuine question - I would love to have someone with your passion and conviction fighting from the same corner as me.
This also extends to _GG_, Alec and Pennyturner who also seemed to express similar views. Would you be willing to help set up a drive for this? It would be a long slog but could make a real impact. Anyone else?
ETA - offer extended to 3Oldponies too![]()
Hi all
Please don't buy rescues, as you are creating the demand for them, which unscrupulous suppliers/dealers will profit from.
I understand that you do it with the best of intentions (and a certain feel good factor from posting about your good deeds, perhaps).
But think - the supplier is using your 'fuel' money or '£50 fee' to produce the next larger crop of neglected, ecto and endoparasite-ridden, malnourished and badly conformed equidae thanks to your help. You are colluding in equine misery.
If they are well cared for meat horses - let them go for meat. If they are not, report the owners to the police, BHS, WHW, Etc, and let action be taken against them to prevent a recurrence.
Please don't fund this.
S![]()
Agree a solution is needed! PTS should be subsided and youngsters gelded .... Maybe a bill needs to be passed. Long road ahead!
Surely people who can't afford £150 to put a horse down or geld it should not own it in the first place? I would be really cross if irresponsible owners were rewarded by having gelding or euthanasia costs subsidised.
If you subsidised gelding these 'meat colts' you simply make breeding them more economically viable and more will be bred.
It cost me exactly £150 to have a seventeen hand horse shot and removed in May this year.
Please think about signing this,
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/66742
and get them to use the existing regulations.
A lot of the fluffy bunnies won't have the horse shot. If you have the injection then the carcass can't be used for meat so disposal costs are higher.
The problem is that it doesn't just cost £150 to put a horse down, you then have to factor in the removal costs as well - I paid £350 for removal of my horse that died. It isn't economically viable for these breeders to PTS the unwanted, hence them going for a pittance. As for gelding - I was paid £250 plus callout for an at home geld, it would have been £400 if at the vets. And if only one testicle descends and they have to wait till they are two you then need a geld and tie - more expense. And if you have a rig £1200-£1500 to remove.
There are huge costs involved in PTS and gelding. There has to be a better way?