Mongoose11
Well-Known Member
I am deffo the one in 20. 19 of you are safe, because of me!
So either I need to lose about 2 stone or I need to add 50 kilos to my horses weight, best get the feed out
Erm, is that actually right? My horse is just under 500kg ish and that means I should weigh 7 1/2 stone ish, I certainly don't weigh that little?!
Mine was 450KG on the weigh bridge last time (15.2 TB). So I can only weigh 7 stone. Which would make me clinically quite underweight at 5'3''
I do believer the fail is, as usual, talking a load of BS
Daughters pony is 380 kg 13 2 connie show jumper and she is 44kg, 10 yrs old, (so in bsja could still be in 12 2 classes) tall and skinny.
God dammit that paper is so retarded it actually makes me want to kill myself. There really is no help for this country whilst people still read that horse you know what
Is it not more 'retarded' to confuse a newspaper with a research paper published by the Journal of Veterinary Behaviour?
I am just off to regurgitate my cream egg......
I am a scientist, I know what a paper looks like, I read them for a living. But thanks for the concern that I might be confused
I would read the journal article but, as usual, the retards at the Mail haven't bothered to link to it or supply a proper reference for me to use to find it.
I would read the journal article but, as usual, the retards at the Mail haven't bothered to link to it or supply a proper reference for me to use to find it.
ETA: without wishing to disrespect the author I wouldn't be overly concerned either! Her previous publications are in all kinds of weird and wacky things like whether the whorls a horse has makes it more likely to weave ( I am paraphrasing).
I'm a master of science myself.
The article is an entirely factual summary of the paper with verbatim quotation from related experts. There is no editorial spin that I can see. You're just as likely to read the same report in any other newspaper.
Since you seem unwilling to find the website of a named publication on the internet I will assist you with a single-click link to the research, though if you are a new scientist you will need to register before you can view it).
Click me.
So either I need to lose about 2 stone or I need to add 50 kilos to my horses weight, best get the feed out
I'm a master of science myself.
The article is an entirely factual summary of the paper with verbatim quotation from related experts. There is no editorial spin that I can see. You're just as likely to read the same report in any other newspaper.
Since you seem unwilling to find the website of a named publication on the internet I will assist you with a single-click link to the research, though if you are a new scientist you will need to register before you can view it).
Click me.
I also don't actually want to read it based on her previous publications, her institution and the subject matter
Will just have to take your word for it, personally I feel that it's the responsibility of good science to be published open access, particularly where there is no commercial issue and only welfare standards to gain.
Ahh, you're that type of scientist